Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Clodinafop had no negative effect on wheat yield with greater water availability.

A claim from Agronomic performance of wheat under post-emergence herbicide application · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop had no negative effect on wheat yield with greater water availability.

Treatment
clodinafope0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no negative effecte0
Qualifier
greater water availabilitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greater water availability (E2), 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam and triclopyr were selective to the wheat, with no negative effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280

Title

Agronomic performance of wheat under post-emergence herbicide application

Miguel Colombo; Leandro Paiola Albrecht; Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht; et al. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 2022. doi:10.1590/1983-40632022v5269908

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-9a88fe79bc3a3f0f2f08016e8cef6b76b781e6850236a9122aefe6843a000743 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.