Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Evaluation of herbicides alone and in combination for weed control in wheat

Archana Kumari; Satish Kumar; Bhagat Singh; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Metribuzin alone 210 g/ha resulted in significantly lower population of Phalaris minor than alone application of clodinafop 60 g/ha, pinoxaden 40 g/ha and sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha. Application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/ha and 25 + 210 g/ha resulted in significantly lower population of P. minor and C. album, respectively. Sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/ha resulted in 89.2% WCE which was at par with sulfosulfuron + metribuzin 25 + 210 g/ha. Weed control treatments produced significantly higher grain yield as compared to weedy check. Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha being significantly superior to alone application of metribuzin 210 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha and pinoxaden 40 g/ha produced higher wheat grain yield, which was evident from the higher WCE as compared to other herbicides. Ready-mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron at 32 g/ha produced the highest grain yield (6.42 t/ha) among different herbicide treatments but it was statistically at par with weed free.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin alone at 210 g/ha gave a significantly lower population of Phalaris minor than clodinafop, pinoxaden and sulfosulfuron alone.

Treatment
Metribuzin alone 210 g/hae1
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore1weed
Outcome
population of Phalaris minore1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
clodinafop 60 g/ha, pinoxaden 40 g/ha and sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Metribuzin alone 210 g/ha resulted in significantly lower population of Phalaris minor than alone application of clodinafop 60 g/ha, pinoxaden 40 g/ha and sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron at 32 g/ha gave a significantly lower population of Phalaris minor.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/hae2
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore2weed
Outcome
population of P. minore2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/ha and 25 + 210 g/ha resulted in significantly lower population of P. minor and C. album, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron plus metribuzin at 25 + 210 g/ha gave a significantly lower weed population of C. album.

Treatment
25 + 210 g/hae2
Interactor
C. albume2weed
Outcome
populatione2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/ha and 25 + 210 g/ha resulted in significantly lower population of P. minor and C. album, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron at 32 g/ha gave 89.2% weed control efficiency (WCE), at par with sulfosulfuron plus metribuzin at 25 + 210 g/ha.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/hae4
Outcome
WCEe4
Direction
at pare4
Value
89.2%e4
Comparator
sulfosulfuron + metribuzin 25 + 210 g/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron 32 g/ha resulted in 89.2% WCE which was at par with sulfosulfuron + metribuzin 25 + 210 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments gave significantly higher wheat grain yield than the weedy check.

Treatment
Weed control treatmentse5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
weedy checke5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“Weed control treatments produced significantly higher grain yield as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron at 25 g/ha gave significantly higher wheat grain yield than metribuzin, clodinafop and pinoxaden alone.

Treatment
Sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
metribuzin 210 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha and pinoxaden 40 g/hae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha being significantly superior to alone application of metribuzin 210 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha and pinoxaden 40 g/ha produced higher wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron at 25 g/ha gave higher weed control efficiency than other herbicides.

Treatment
Sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae6
Outcome
WCEe7
Direction
highere7
Comparator
other herbicidese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha being significantly superior to alone application of metribuzin 210 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha and pinoxaden 40 g/ha produced higher wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–716 · show in text ↑
e7

“which was evident from the higher WCE as compared to other herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron at 32 g/ha gave the highest wheat grain yield (6.42 t/ha) among herbicide treatments.

Treatment
Ready-mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron at 32 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.42 t/hae0
Comparator
different herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ready-mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron at 32 g/ha produced the highest grain yield (6.42 t/ha) among different herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix sulfosulfuron plus metsulfuron at 32 g/ha gave wheat grain yield statistically at par with weed free.

Treatment
Ready-mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron at 32 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
at pare2
Comparator
weed freee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ready-mix application of sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron at 32 g/ha produced the highest grain yield (6.42 t/ha) among different herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–934 · show in text ↑
e2

“but it was statistically at par with weed free”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–981 · show in text ↑

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

metribuzin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.