Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grains per spike were higher with the mixture, reaching 55.9.

A claim from Effects of Herbicides and Nano Urea Mixture on Weeds, Yield Attributes and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per spike were higher with the mixture, reaching 55.9.

Treatment
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1e0
Outcome
number of grains spike-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
55.9e0
Comparator
clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of grains spike-1 (55.9) and 1000-grain weight (43.8) were higher with application of clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1 with nano urea 3 ml L-1 followed by clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 210 g ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1251
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–109

Title

Effects of Herbicides and Nano Urea Mixture on Weeds, Yield Attributes and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Mo Asif; Todar Mal Poonia; Virender Singh Hooda; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i123785

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-daa00e86df2d33462543005d09df1954c10aaecbf26779e5c36540ae85cd7076 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.