Paper · 2003 · Experimental Agriculture

EFFECTS OF TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF FERTILIZER USE ON MAIZE AND WHEAT YIELDS AND QUALITY OF AN ACIDIC SOIL IN THE WESTERN HIMALAYAS

S. P. SHARMA; S. K. SUBEHIA

19
claims
33
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a field experiment initiated in the 1972/73 rabi season (November–March) on an acidic soil in the western Himalayas of India, continuous cropping for 25 years with nitrogen fertilizer alone reduced the grain yields of maize ( Zea mays ) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) to almost zero. Based on five-year moving average values, the application of 100% NP resulted in a reduction of grain yields of maize and wheat crops by 67 and 19% respectively during 1994 to1998 compared with 1973 to 1977. The crops did not respond to K application during the initial years of cropping, but a significant reduction in crop yields was observed in the absence of K after five years of continuous cropping. With the integrated use of chemical fertilizers (100% NPK) and farmyard manure, the pooled grain yields of 25 years were about 4600 and 3300 kg ha −1 for maize and wheat respectively. Corresponding yields with the use of chemical fertilizers and lime (100% NPK + lime) were 4000 and 3100 kg ha −1 respectively. The use of nitrogenous fertilizer alone aggravated the problem of soil acidity by lowering the pH from 5.8 to 4.7 after 25 years. In almost all the treatments, the organic carbon content increased: a marginal decrease occurred in the 100% N and control plots. Even under optimum application rates, the available N and K status decreased with time. Again with the exception of the control plots, the contents of the Diphenyl Triamine Penta Acetic Acid-extractable micronutrients were sufficiently high for the crops in all the treatments. The available sulphur decreased with the use of di-ammonium phosphate as the P source, which drastically reduced the yields of both crops. In the N-alone treatment the weed flora also changed with the change in soil environment. There is a need to review fertilizer recommendations in this region of India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen alone reduced maize grain yield to almost zero after 25 years.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer alonee0
Outcome
grain yields of maizee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
almost zeroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous cropping for 25 years with nitrogen fertilizer alone reduced the grain yields of maize ( Zea mays ) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) to almost zero”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen alone reduced wheat grain yield to almost zero after 25 years.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizer alonee0
Outcome
grain yields of maize ( Zea mays ) and wheate0
Direction
reducede0
Value
almost zeroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous cropping for 25 years with nitrogen fertilizer alone reduced the grain yields of maize ( Zea mays ) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) to almost zero”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 100% NP, maize grain yield fell 67% in 1994 to 1998 relative to 1973 to 1977.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
100% NPe0
Outcome
grain yields of maizee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
67e0
Comparator
1973 to 1977e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100% NP resulted in a reduction of grain yields of maize and wheat crops by 67 and 19% respectively during 1994 to1998 compared with 1973 to 1977”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 100% NP, wheat grain yield fell 19% in 1994 to 1998 relative to 1973 to 1977.

Treatment
100% NPe0
Outcome
grain yields of maize and wheat cropse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
1973 to 1977e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100% NP resulted in a reduction of grain yields of maize and wheat crops by 67 and 19% respectively during 1994 to1998 compared with 1973 to 1977”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crops initially did not respond to K application.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Treatment
K applicatione0
Outcome
did not responde0
Direction
did not responde0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The crops did not respond to K application during the initial years of cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After five years, crop yields were significantly lower without K.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Treatment
absence of Ke0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a significant reduction in crop yields was observed in the absence of K after five years of continuous cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 100% NPK and farmyard manure produced pooled maize grain yield of about 4600 kg ha −1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
chemical fertilizers (100% NPK) and farmyard manuree0
Outcome
pooled grain yieldse0
Value
4600e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the integrated use of chemical fertilizers (100% NPK) and farmyard manure, the pooled grain yields of 25 years were about 4600 and 3300 kg ha −1 for maize and wheat respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 100% NPK and farmyard manure produced pooled wheat grain yield of about 3300 kg ha −1.

Treatment
chemical fertilizers (100% NPK) and farmyard manuree0
Outcome
pooled grain yieldse0
Value
3300 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the integrated use of chemical fertilizers (100% NPK) and farmyard manure, the pooled grain yields of 25 years were about 4600 and 3300 kg ha −1 for maize and wheat respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 100% NPK and lime, maize grain yield was 4000 kg ha −1.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
100% NPK + limee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Value
4000e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corresponding yields with the use of chemical fertilizers and lime (100% NPK + lime) were 4000 and 3100 kg ha −1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 100% NPK and lime, wheat grain yield was 3100 kg ha −1.

Treatment
100% NPK + limee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Value
3100 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corresponding yields with the use of chemical fertilizers and lime (100% NPK + lime) were 4000 and 3100 kg ha −1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen alone lowered soil pH from 5.8 to 4.7 over 25 years.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Treatment
nitrogenous fertilizer alonee0
Outcome
soil aciditye0
Direction
loweringe0
Value
5.8 to 4.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of nitrogenous fertilizer alone aggravated the problem of soil acidity by lowering the pH from 5.8 to 4.7 after 25 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon increased in almost all treatments.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Outcome
organic carbon contente0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“In almost all the treatments, the organic carbon content increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon marginally decreased in 100% N and control plots.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Treatment
100% N and control plotse0
Outcome
organic carbon contente1
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“a marginal decrease occurred in the 100% N and control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“the organic carbon content increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil N and K decreased over time even at optimum application rates.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Outcome
available N and K statuse0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Even under optimum application rates, the available N and K status decreased with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTPA-extractable micronutrients were sufficiently high for crops in all treatments except control.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Outcome
contents of the Diphenyl Triamine Penta Acetic Acid-extractable micronutrientse0
Direction
sufficiently highe0

Verbatim

e0

“with the exception of the control plots, the contents of the Diphenyl Triamine Penta Acetic Acid-extractable micronutrients were sufficiently high for the crops in all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Di-ammonium phosphate as P source decreased available sulphur.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Treatment
di-ammonium phosphatee0
Outcome
available sulphure0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The available sulphur decreased with the use of di-ammonium phosphate as the P source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of di-ammonium phosphate as P source drastically reduced yields of both crops.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Treatment
di-ammonium phosphatee0
Outcome
yields of both cropse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The available sulphur decreased with the use of di-ammonium phosphate as the P source, which drastically reduced the yields of both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1680 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed flora changed in the N-alone treatment as soil environment changed.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Treatment
N-alone treatmente0
Interactor
weed florae0weed
Outcome
weed flora also changede0

Verbatim

e0

“In the N-alone treatment the weed flora also changed with the change in soil environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1770 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend reviewing fertilizer recommendations in the region.

Taxon
MAIZE AND WHEATt0
Outcome
review fertilizer recommendationse0
Setting
this region of Indiae0

Verbatim

e0

“There is a need to review fertilizer recommendations in this region of India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1848 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE AND WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

85 papers: 71 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

233 papers: 215 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 215 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

229 papers more in this group

See all 233 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 242 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.