Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar nano P with DAP slightly increased postharvest soil macro and micronutrients.

A claim from Effect of Nano-Phosphorus Formulation on Growth, Yield and Nutritional Quality of Wheat under Semi-Arid Climate · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano P with DAP slightly increased postharvest soil macro and micronutrients.

Treatment
foliar application of nano-P fertilizer in combination with different levels of diammonium phosphate (DAP)e0
Outcome
amount of N, P and K, as well as micronutrients in post-harvest soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of nano-P fertilizer in combination with different levels of diammonium phosphate (DAP) slightly increased the amount of N, P and K, as well as micronutrients in post-harvest soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1984
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87

Title

Effect of Nano-Phosphorus Formulation on Growth, Yield and Nutritional Quality of Wheat under Semi-Arid Climate

Anuj Poudel; Satish Kumar Singh; Raimundo Jiménez-Ballesta; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13030768

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e633423cbcf0d855590095f9ccbd7f3d78b6d2a43f33068fbf437037e534d65f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.