Paper · 2022 · The Scientific World JOURNAL

Impact of Different Nanoparticles on Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plants, Course, and Intensity of Photosynthesis

Lauris Jankovskis; Inese Kokina; Ilona Plaksenkova; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The size of nanoparticles (NPs) allows them to accumulate in plants, and they affect plant growth by altering the size of leaves and roots and affecting their photosynthetic reactions by altering the composition of proteins in the electron transport chain, chlorophyll biosynthesis, and carbohydrate synthesis reactions. Plants play an important role on Earth as nutrient producers in all trophic food webs by producing oxygen, absorbing carbon dioxide, and synthesizing edible carbohydrates during photosynthesis. In this study, Fe3O4 and ZnO NPs at various concentrations (0, 1, 2, and 4 mg/l) were used to investigate the effect of NPs on plant morphological parameters and photosynthesis intensity, determining the amount of chlorophyll and the absorption of their light spectrum in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Fe3O4 (25 nm, 2 mg/l, and 4 mg/l) and ZnO (32 nm, 4 mg/l) significantly increased the leaf length of common wheat seedlings. However, Fe3O4 NPs (25 nm, 1 mg/l, and 4 mg/l) significantly reduced light absorption at 645 and 663 nm and the content of chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a, and total chlorophyll, but Fe3O4 (25 nm, 2 mg/l) significantly reduced the chlorophyll a content. In addition, ZnO NPs (32 nm, 1 mg/l) significantly increased the chlorophyll b content. This study has made a major contribution to understanding the effect of low concentrations of NPs on plant seedlings. Currently, NPs with high concentrations, starting at 10 mg/l, have been analysed in other studies, but in the environment, NPs enter plants in low concentrations as dust or through water droplets. Therefore, it is important to determine the potential impact of small concentrations of NPs on crops that are important for agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe3O4 nanoparticles (25 nm, 2 and 4 mg/l) significantly increased wheat seedling leaf length.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Treatment
Fe3O4 (25 nm, 2 mg/l, and 4 mg/l)e1
Outcome
leaf lengthe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe3O4 (25 nm, 2 mg/l, and 4 mg/l) and ZnO (32 nm, 4 mg/l) significantly increased the leaf length of common wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles (32 nm, 4 mg/l) significantly increased wheat seedling leaf length.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Treatment
ZnO (32 nm, 4 mg/l)e1
Outcome
leaf lengthe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fe3O4 (25 nm, 2 mg/l, and 4 mg/l) and ZnO (32 nm, 4 mg/l) significantly increased the leaf length of common wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe3O4 nanoparticles (1 and 4 mg/l) significantly reduced light absorption at 645 and 663 nm in wheat.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Fe3O4 NPs (25 nm, 1 mg/l, and 4 mg/l)e2
Outcome
light absorption at 645 and 663 nme2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–822 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fe3O4 NPs (25 nm, 1 mg/l, and 4 mg/l) significantly reduced light absorption at 645 and 663 nm and the content of chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a, and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe3O4 nanoparticles (1 and 4 mg/l) significantly reduced chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll content in wheat.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Fe3O4 NPs (25 nm, 1 mg/l, and 4 mg/l)e2
Outcome
the content of chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a, and total chlorophylle2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–822 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fe3O4 NPs (25 nm, 1 mg/l, and 4 mg/l) significantly reduced light absorption at 645 and 663 nm and the content of chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a, and total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe3O4 nanoparticles (25 nm, 2 mg/l) significantly reduced wheat chlorophyll a content.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Fe3O4 (25 nm, 2 mg/l)e3
Outcome
chlorophyll a contente3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–822 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fe3O4 (25 nm, 2 mg/l) significantly reduced the chlorophyll a content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles (32 nm, 1 mg/l) significantly increased wheat chlorophyll b content.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
ZnO NPs (32 nm, 1 mg/l)e4
Outcome
chlorophyll b contente4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–822 · show in text ↑
e4

“ZnO NPs (32 nm, 1 mg/l) significantly increased the chlorophyll b content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1286 · show in text ↑

zinc oxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

zinc oxide · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 51 positive, 6 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.