Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Using Synchrotron-Based Approaches To Examine the Foliar Application of ZnSO4 and ZnO Nanoparticles for Field-Grown Winter Wheat

Teng Zhang; Hongda Sun; Zhiyuan Lv; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
148
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of foliar-applied ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and ZnSO4 on the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and grain quality were studied under field conditions, with the distribution and speciation of Zn within the grain examined using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Although neither of the two Zn compounds improved the grain yield or quality, both increased the grain Zn concentration (average increments were 5 and 10 mg/kg for ZnSO4 and ZnO NP treatments, respectively). Across all treatments, this Zn was mainly located within the aleurone layer and crease of the grain, although the application of ZnO NPs also slightly increased Zn within the endosperm. This Zn within the grain was found to be present as Zn phosphate, regardless of the form in which Zn was applied. These results indicate that the foliar application of ZnO NPs appears to be a promising approach for Zn biofortification, as required to improve human health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 did not improve grain yield or quality.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO4e0
Outcome
grain yield or qualitye0
Direction
neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of foliar-applied ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and ZnSO4 on the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and grain quality were studied under field conditions, with the distribution and speciation of Zn within the grain examined using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Although neither of the two Zn compounds improved the grain yield or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles did not improve grain yield or quality.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO nanoparticlese0
Outcome
grain yield or qualitye0
Direction
neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of foliar-applied ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and ZnSO4 on the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and grain quality were studied under field conditions, with the distribution and speciation of Zn within the grain examined using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Although neither of the two Zn compounds improved the grain yield or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 increased grain Zn concentration by an average 5 mg/kg.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnSO4e0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both increased the grain Zn concentration (average increments were 5 and 10 mg/kg for ZnSO4 and ZnO NP treatments, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles increased grain Zn concentration by an average 10 mg/kg.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO NP treatmentse0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10 mg/kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both increased the grain Zn concentration (average increments were 5 and 10 mg/kg for ZnSO4 and ZnO NP treatments, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across treatments, grain zinc was mainly in the aleurone layer and crease.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
aleurone layer and creasee0
Outcome
Zn was mainly located within the aleurone layer and crease of the graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across all treatments, this Zn was mainly located within the aleurone layer and crease of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles slightly increased endosperm zinc.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
endosperme0
Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
Zn within the endosperme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of ZnO NPs also slightly increased Zn within the endosperm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc was present as Zn phosphate regardless of application form.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
present as Zn phosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This Zn within the grain was found to be present as Zn phosphate, regardless of the form in which Zn was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors regard foliar ZnO nanoparticles as promising for zinc biofortification.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO NPse0
Outcome
foliar application of ZnO NPse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of ZnO NPs appears to be a promising approach for Zn biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.