Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles increased grain Zn concentration by an average 10 mg/kg.

A claim from Using Synchrotron-Based Approaches To Examine the Foliar Application of ZnSO4 and ZnO Nanoparticles for Field-Grown Winter Wheat · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles increased grain Zn concentration by an average 10 mg/kg.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO NP treatmentse0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10 mg/kge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both increased the grain Zn concentration (average increments were 5 and 10 mg/kg for ZnSO4 and ZnO NP treatments, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–542
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128

Title

Using Synchrotron-Based Approaches To Examine the Foliar Application of ZnSO4 and ZnO Nanoparticles for Field-Grown Winter Wheat

Teng Zhang; Hongda Sun; Zhiyuan Lv; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2017. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04153

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4bad5b6ed6ff22b31066a57907147b8e5344df8a7974cca92a79122cf175288b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.