Intervention effectmodel-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles did not improve grain yield or quality.

A claim from Using Synchrotron-Based Approaches To Examine the Foliar Application of ZnSO4 and ZnO Nanoparticles for Field-Grown Winter Wheat · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO nanoparticles did not improve grain yield or quality.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ZnO nanoparticlese0
Outcome
grain yield or qualitye0
Direction
neithere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of foliar-applied ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and ZnSO4 on the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and grain quality were studied under field conditions, with the distribution and speciation of Zn within the grain examined using synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Although neither of the two Zn compounds improved the grain yield or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–412
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 116–128

Title

Using Synchrotron-Based Approaches To Examine the Foliar Application of ZnSO4 and ZnO Nanoparticles for Field-Grown Winter Wheat

Teng Zhang; Hongda Sun; Zhiyuan Lv; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2017. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04153

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a6f3913c33765ae9b7058246862c00b72754cf4e3b3b36e31c2edcaff76dd715 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.