Paper · 2021 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of Environmentally Benign Nano-nitrogen, Potassium, Zinc on Growth and Yield Enhancement in Triticum aestivum

Promila Sheoran; Sapna Grewal; Santosh Kumari; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Wheat is staple diet for majority of people of world and requires several nutrients for optimum growth like Nitrogen, Potassium and Zinc etc. These nutrients when added in the form of chemical fertilizers definitely increase production but at the cost of negative impact on soil, air, water and living beings. Nanoformulations can provide a possible solution to this problem. The current study tried to assess the impact of foliar application of Nano-N, K, Zn on morphological and yield related parameters of wheat. Methods: Wheat plants were grown up to harvesting stage for two consecutive years from 2018 to 2020. Pots grown plants were treated with three different concentrations of Nano-N, K, Zn and bulk/chemical N, K, Zn along-with a control setup having no external nutrients supplement. Several morphological and yield related parameters were recorded. Result: Application of Nano-N, K, Zn resulted in statistically significant increase in plant height, seeds per spike, root length, 100 seed weight, yield and biomass accumulation compared to the control and bulk/chemical N, K, Zn. Highest yield per pot of 23.87 g was obtained under nano-N, K, Zn treatment while yield under bulk fertilizers and control setup was only 7.54 g and 4.38 g respectively. Our work presents a novel combination of nitrogen, potassium and zinc nanofertilizers which not only increase quality of wheat produce but also environment friendly too.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-N, K, Zn significantly increased plant height, seeds per spike, and root length relative to control and bulk fertilizers.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Nano-N, K, Zne0
Outcome
plant height, seeds per spike, root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control and bulk/chemical N, K, Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Nano-N, K, Zn resulted in statistically significant increase in plant height, seeds per spike, root length, 100 seed weight, yield and biomass accumulation compared to the control and bulk/chemical N, K, Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-N, K, Zn significantly increased 100 seed weight, yield, and biomass accumulation relative to control and bulk fertilizers.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Nano-N, K, Zne0
Outcome
100 seed weight, yield and biomass accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control and bulk/chemical N, K, Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Nano-N, K, Zn resulted in statistically significant increase in plant height, seeds per spike, root length, 100 seed weight, yield and biomass accumulation compared to the control and bulk/chemical N, K, Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under nano-N, K, Zn reached 23.87 g per pot.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nano-N, K, Zn treatmente0
Outcome
yield per pote0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
23.87 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yield per pot of 23.87 g was obtained under nano-N, K, Zn treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under bulk fertilizers was 7.54 g per pot.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
bulk fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
onlye0
Value
7.54 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield under bulk fertilizers and control setup was only 7.54 g and 4.38 g respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under the control setup was 4.38 g per pot.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
control setupe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
onlye0
Value
4.38 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield under bulk fertilizers and control setup was only 7.54 g and 4.38 g respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report improved quality of wheat produce under the nanofertilizer combination.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
nitrogen, potassium and zinc nanofertilizerse0
Outcome
quality of wheat producee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of nitrogen, potassium and zinc nanofertilizers which not only increase quality of wheat produce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–116 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

94 papers: 74 positive, 20 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.