Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Influence of the foliar application of integrated use of Nano urea and traditional fertilizers on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Vipul Kumar Mishra; Ashish Nath; Bhupesh Kumar Mishra; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted during 2024-25 at the Agricultural Research Farm, Maharishi School of Science and Humanities, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, to evaluate the impact of Nano urea and different levels of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) on wheat. Results revealed that the application of 100% RDF + 4 ml/L Nano urea (two sprays at jointing and panicle initiation stages) significantly improved growth, yield attributes, and grain yield compared to other treatments. This treatment (T4) showed the highest initial and final plant population, 1000 grain weight, grains per spike, and grain yield (q/ha), followed by 100% RDF + 4 ml/L Nano urea (one spray at panicle initiation), and 75% RDF + 4 ml/L Nano urea (three sprays at CRI, jointing, and panicle initiation). The control group consistently recorded the lowest values across all parameters. The findings indicate that Nano urea, when applied with full RDF at critical growth stages, enhances wheat performance significantly in terms of both growth and productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of Nano urea with 100% RDF significantly improved wheat growth, yield attributes and grain yield against other treatments.

Treatment
100% RDF + 4 ml/L Nano urea (two sprays at jointing and panicle initiation stages)e0
Outcome
growth, yield attributes, and grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that the application of 100% RDF + 4 ml/L Nano urea (two sprays at jointing and panicle initiation stages) significantly improved growth, yield attributes, and grain yield compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had the highest initial and final plant population and yield components.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
initial and final plant population, 1000 grain weight, grains per spike, and grain yield (q/ha)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment (T4) showed the highest initial and final plant population, 1000 grain weight, grains per spike, and grain yield (q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One spray with full RDF ranked second and three sprays with 75% RDF ranked third.

Treatment
100% RDF + 4 ml/L Nano urea (one spray at panicle initiation)e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 100% RDF + 4 ml/L Nano urea (one spray at panicle initiation), and 75% RDF + 4 ml/L Nano urea (three sprays at CRI, jointing, and panicle initiation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control group had the lowest values across all parameters.

Treatment
control groupe0
Outcome
values across all parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control group consistently recorded the lowest values across all parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–146 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.