Paper · 2019 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Effects of ZnSO4 and Zn‐EDTA applied by broadcasting or by banding on soil Zn fractions and Zn uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under greenhouse conditions

Aiqing Zhao; Shu Yang; Bini Wang; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Zinc biofortification of staple food crops is essential for alleviating worldwide human malnutrition. Agronomic interventions to promote this should include fertilizer selection and management. A chelated Zn source, Zn‐EDTA, and an inorganic Zn source, ZnSO 4 × 7 H 2 O, were applied either by banding or by broadcasting in soil, and Zn fractions in soil and Zn uptake by wheat were determined in a pot experiment. Compared to ZnSO 4 × 7 H 2 O, Zn‐EDTA produced higher Zn concentration in grain regardless of application method and even at a lower application rate. Residual Zn fraction was the largest Zn fraction with both ZnSO 4 and Zn‐EDTA amendment. ZnSO 4 banded in soil caused Zn fractions to be restricted to the Zn‐amended soil band and resulted in lower grain Zn concentrations than did broadcast ZnSO 4 . Planting wheat slowed Zn fixation by promoting the maintenance of a high concentration of Zn fraction loosely bound to organic matter (LOM‐Zn) in soil. Zn‐EDTA was a better Zn source for Zn biofortification of wheat than was ZnSO 4 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn‐EDTA produced higher grain zinc concentration than ZnSO 4 × 7 H 2 O regardless of application method.

Treatment
Zn‐EDTAe0
Outcome
Zn concentration in graine0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
regardless of application method and even at a lower application ratee0
Comparator
ZnSO 4 × 7 H 2 Oe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to ZnSO 4 × 7 H 2 O, Zn‐EDTA produced higher Zn concentration in grain regardless of application method and even at a lower application rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual zinc was the largest soil zinc fraction after either zinc amendment.

Treatment
both ZnSO 4 and Zn‐EDTA amendmente0
Outcome
Residual Zn fractione0
Direction
largeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual Zn fraction was the largest Zn fraction with both ZnSO 4 and Zn‐EDTA amendment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded ZnSO 4 restricted zinc fractions to the amended soil band.

Treatment
ZnSO 4 banded in soile0
Outcome
Zn fractionse0
Direction
restrictede0
Qualifier
Zn‐amended soil bande0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnSO 4 banded in soil caused Zn fractions to be restricted to the Zn‐amended soil band”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded ZnSO 4 gave lower grain zinc concentration than broadcast ZnSO 4.

Treatment
ZnSO 4 banded in soile0
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
broadcast ZnSO 4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnSO 4 banded in soil caused Zn fractions to be restricted to the Zn‐amended soil band and resulted in lower grain Zn concentrations than did broadcast ZnSO 4 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting wheat slowed zinc fixation while maintaining a high loosely bound organic matter zinc fraction.

Treatment
Planting wheate0
Outcome
Zn fixatione0
Direction
slowede0
Qualifier
maintenance of a high concentration of Zn fraction loosely bound to organic matter (LOM‐Zn) in soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting wheat slowed Zn fixation by promoting the maintenance of a high concentration of Zn fraction loosely bound to organic matter (LOM‐Zn) in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Zn‐EDTA was judged the better source for wheat zinc biofortification than ZnSO 4.

Treatment
Zn‐EDTAe0
Outcome
Zn biofortification of wheate0
Comparator
ZnSO 4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn‐EDTA was a better Zn source for Zn biofortification of wheat than was ZnSO 4 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1058 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.