Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined NPK and NANO-GRO did not affect grain yield or its components in common wheat or spelt.

A claim from Nutritional and technological characteristics of common and spelt wheats are affected by mineral fertilizer and organic stimulator NANO-GRO · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK and NANO-GRO did not affect grain yield or its components in common wheat or spelt.

Taxon
common wheat and speltTriticum aestivumTriticum speltae0
Treatment
combined application of basic mineral fertilization (NPK) with an organic growth stimulator, NANO-GRO®e0
Outcome
grain yield and its componentse0
Direction
had no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of basic mineral fertilization (NPK) with an organic growth stimulator, NANO-GRO®, had no effect on the grain yield and its components in common wheat and spelt, except increasing 1000 grain weight in spelt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–944

Title

Nutritional and technological characteristics of common and spelt wheats are affected by mineral fertilizer and organic stimulator NANO-GRO

Arkadiusz Stępień; Katarzyna Wojtkowiak; Krzysztof Orzech; et al. 2016

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e83d1692e36010d08b1d756fa033b984575d4c1350c40b4369729e9935ab019c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum spelta (spelt)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 242 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.