Paper · 2018 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The responses of winter cultivars of common wheat, durum wheat and spelt to agronomic factors

W. S. Budzyński; K. Bepirszcz; K. J. Jankowski; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment with the 3 5–1 fractional factorial design and five factors ( k = 5) at three levels ( s = 3) was performed in 2007–2010 at the Agricultural Experiment Station in Bałcyny, north-eastern (NE) Poland. The results of the experiment carried out under the agro-ecological conditions of NE Poland confirmed the high yield potential of common wheat and satisfactory yield potential of spelt and durum wheat. On average, durum wheat and spelt yields were 2.14 and 2.55 t/ha lower, respectively, than common wheat yields. Sowing date was not correlated with the yields of analysed Triticum species. Seed rate (350, 450 and 550 seeds/m 2 ) had no significant influence on the grain yield of winter cultivars of common wheat, durum wheat and spelt. Common wheat cv. Oliwin and durum wheat cv. Komnata were characterized by the highest yields in response to nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates calculated based on the N min content of soil. An increase in the spring fertilizer rate by 40 kg N/ha in excess of the balanced N rate was not justified because it did not induce a further increase in the grain yield of common wheat and durum wheat. The grain yield of spelt cv. Schwabenkorn continued to increase in response to the highest rate of N fertilizer in spring (40 kg N/ha higher than the optimal rate). Intensified fungicide treatments improved grain yield in all Triticum species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common wheat showed high yield potential.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
high yield potentiale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“confirmed the high yield potential of common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spelt and durum wheat showed satisfactory yield potential.

Outcome
satisfactory yield potentiale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“satisfactory yield potential of spelt and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat yield averaged 2.14 t/ha below common wheat.

Outcome
durum wheat and spelt yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2.14e0
Comparator
common wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat and spelt yields were 2.14 and 2.55 t/ha lower, respectively, than common wheat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spelt yield averaged 2.55 t/ha below common wheat.

Outcome
durum wheat and spelt yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2.55 t/hae0
Comparator
common wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“durum wheat and spelt yields were 2.14 and 2.55 t/ha lower, respectively, than common wheat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–539 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date was not correlated with Triticum yields.

Taxon
Triticum speciesTriticume0
Treatment
Sowing datee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing date was not correlated with the yields of analysed Triticum species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed rate did not significantly influence yields of the three winter crops.

Treatment
Seed rate (350, 450 and 550 seeds/m 2 )e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed rate (350, 450 and 550 seeds/m 2 ) had no significant influence on the grain yield of winter cultivars of common wheat, durum wheat and spelt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oliwin common wheat had the highest yield response to nitrogen rates.

Taxon
Common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Oliwine0
Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
highest yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common wheat cv. Oliwin and durum wheat cv. Komnata were characterized by the highest yields in response to nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Komnata durum wheat had the highest yield response to nitrogen rates.

Material
Komnatae0
Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
highest yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common wheat cv. Oliwin and durum wheat cv. Komnata were characterized by the highest yields in response to nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional 40 kg N/ha did not further increase common wheat yield.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
40 kg N/ha in excess of the balanced N ratee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not induce a further increasee0
Comparator
balanced N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the spring fertilizer rate by 40 kg N/ha in excess of the balanced N rate was not justified because it did not induce a further increase in the grain yield of common wheat and durum wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional 40 kg N/ha did not further increase durum wheat yield.

Treatment
40 kg N/ha in excess of the balanced N ratee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not induce a further increasee0
Comparator
balanced N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the spring fertilizer rate by 40 kg N/ha in excess of the balanced N rate was not justified because it did not induce a further increase in the grain yield of common wheat and durum wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Schwabenkorn spelt yield continued to rise at the highest spring nitrogen rate.

Material
Schwabenkorne0
Treatment
highest rate of N fertilizer in spring (40 kg N/ha higher than the optimal rate)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
optimal ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield of spelt cv. Schwabenkorn continued to increase in response to the highest rate of N fertilizer in spring (40 kg N/ha higher than the optimal rate).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensified fungicide treatments improved yield in all Triticum species.

Taxon
Triticum speciesTriticume0
Treatment
Intensified fungicide treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intensified fungicide treatments improved grain yield in all Triticum species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1398 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum spelta (spelt)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum spelta (spelt)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

density · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Nitrogen starvation negatively affected spike and seed traits.

    Transcriptomic response of durum wheat to nitrogen starvation · 2017

    No difference from an alternativeAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this paper · 376 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.