Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Effect of Habitat and Foliar Fertilization with K, Zn and Mn on Winter Wheat Grain and Baking Qualities

Magdalena Sobolewska; Anna Wenda-Piesik; Anna Jaroszewska; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
34
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cereal monoculture causes a series of unfavorable changes in field habitat, for example a decrease in technological quality and yield. This system can lead to a shortage of microelements in the diet of poor communities. Moreover, breeding of highly productive plants caused a significant “dilution effect” of the necessary nutrients, such as Zn and Fe. The aim of this work was to determine the effect of two strategies: crop rotation (after rapeseed and many years of monoculture of Galega orientalis Lam.) and foliar fertilization with microelements on the yield, yield elements, physical quality, and farinograph characteristics of winter wheat grain and flour. Results showed that pre-crop preparation and cultivation year have the highest effect on yield, yield components, and qualitative and farinographic characteristics of winter wheat. Foliar additional feeding favorably affected the yield and its components, although the particular fertilization treatment did not significantly increase the yield. Grain quality, its physical characteristics and the rheological parameters of flour were strongly modified by habitat conditions, including weather conditions. Dough obtained from wheat grown after galega showed significantly higher water absorption and prolonged consistency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-crop preparation and cultivation year had the highest effect on winter wheat yield and yield components.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
pre-crop preparation and cultivation yeare0
Outcome
yield, yield componentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-crop preparation and cultivation year have the highest effect on yield, yield components, and qualitative and farinographic characteristics of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–844 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-crop preparation and cultivation year had the highest effect on winter wheat qualitative and farinographic characteristics.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
pre-crop preparation and cultivation yeare0
Outcome
qualitative and farinographic characteristicse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-crop preparation and cultivation year have the highest effect on yield, yield components, and qualitative and farinographic characteristics of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar additional feeding favorably affected winter wheat yield and its components.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Foliar additional feedinge0
Outcome
yield and its componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar additional feeding favorably affected the yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Particular foliar fertilization treatments did not significantly increase winter wheat yield.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
particular fertilization treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the particular fertilization treatment did not significantly increase the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Habitat and weather conditions strongly modified winter wheat grain quality, physical characteristics, and flour rheology.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Grain quality, its physical characteristics and the rheological parameters of floure0
Setting
habitat conditions, including weather conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain quality, its physical characteristics and the rheological parameters of flour were strongly modified by habitat conditions, including weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dough from wheat grown after galega had significantly higher water absorption and prolonged consistency.

Treatment
grown after galegae0
Outcome
water absorption and prolonged consistencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dough obtained from wheat grown after galega showed significantly higher water absorption and prolonged consistency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1286 · show in text ↑

infection · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 32 positive, 51 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.