Paper · 2019 · Current Science

Crop Stimulants as a Factor Determining the Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat Grown in Notec Valley, Poland

Tomasz Knapowski; Bożena Barczak; Wojciech Kozera; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The application of stimulants to improve growth rate and quality of crops is gaining importance. Such preparations do not harm the environment and may partly supplement the action of nutrients applied. Therefore, during 2012-2014, a study was conducted to evaluate the performance of several stimulants: an amino acid preparation, liquid fertilizer biostimulant, seaweed extract, a multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer and their combinations on wheat grain yield and quality. The results indicated that these preparations strongly influenced grain yield and baking traits such as falling number, protein content, wet gluten, sedimentation value and bread volume. The best results were obtained on using multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer + amino acid preparation, with 20.1% higher yield in 2013 and 22.6% higher yield in 2014 in comparison with the control. The most favourable values of technological features were obtained with multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer in combination with amino acid preparation or seaweed extract. Wet gluten was the highest and the protein content and bread volume were high after spraying wheat with multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer and the next values of protein content and sedimentation resulted from the use of seaweed extract. The interest in nanofertilizers and preparations that stimulate plant growth and development is increasing constantly and it may become one of the essential elements of cultivation technology in future. Broadening the knowledge on bioregulators can result in an increase in the effectiveness of agricultural production as well as in the quality of crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparations influenced wheat grain yield and baking traits.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
these preparationse0
Outcome
grain yield and baking traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these preparations strongly influenced grain yield and baking traits such as falling number, protein content, wet gluten, sedimentation value and bread volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer plus amino acid preparation raised wheat yield by 20.1% in 2013 versus control.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer + amino acid preparatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.1%e0
Qualifier
2013e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer + amino acid preparation, with 20.1% higher yield in 2013 and 22.6% higher yield in 2014 in comparison with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer plus amino acid preparation raised wheat yield by 22.6% in 2014 versus control.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer + amino acid preparatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.6%e0
Qualifier
2014e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer + amino acid preparation, with 20.1% higher yield in 2013 and 22.6% higher yield in 2014 in comparison with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer with amino acid preparation yielded favourable technological features.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer in combination with amino acid preparatione0
Outcome
technological featurese0
Direction
most favourablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most favourable values of technological features were obtained with multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer in combination with amino acid preparation or seaweed extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer with seaweed extract yielded favourable technological features.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer in combination with amino acid preparation or seaweed extracte0
Outcome
technological featurese0
Direction
most favourablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most favourable values of technological features were obtained with multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer in combination with amino acid preparation or seaweed extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanofertilizer spraying yielded the highest wet gluten and high protein and bread volume.

Treatment
multiple natural foliar nanofertilizere0
Outcome
Wet glutene0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wet gluten was the highest and the protein content and bread volume were high after spraying wheat with multiple natural foliar nanofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seaweed extract produced the next protein and sedimentation values.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
seaweed extracte0
Outcome
protein content and sedimentatione0
Direction
nexte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the next values of protein content and sedimentation resulted from the use of seaweed extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–77 · show in text ↑

amino acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.