Paper · 2017 · Weed Technology

Effect of Application Timing on Winter Wheat Response to Metribuzin

Mark J. VanGessel; Quintin R. Johnson; Barbara A. Scott

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Metribuzin will control many problematic weed species in winter wheat in the mid-Atlantic states, including herbicide-resistant biotypes, but it has not been recommended due to crop safety concerns. In a three-year trial, metribuzin was applied at 105 or 210 g ai ha −1 to wheat at the PRE, 2-leaf (Feekes stage 1 to 2), early spring (Feekes stage 3 to 4), and late spring (Feekes stage 4 to 6) growth stages using wheat cultivars sensitive to metribuzin. Early spring applications had the least amount of injury, and injury at this timing was transient and yield was not reduced. Yield loss was observed with the other application timings in at least one out of three years. Rainfall shortly after application appears to increase the risk of wheat injury.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early spring metribuzin applications caused the least wheat injury.

Treatment
metribuzine1
Outcome
injurye2
Direction
leaste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“metribuzin was applied at 105 or 210 g ai ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–266 · show in text ↑
e2

“Early spring applications had the least amount of injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“to wheat at the PRE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injury from early spring metribuzin application was transient.

Treatment
metribuzine1
Outcome
injurye2
Direction
transiente2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“metribuzin was applied at 105 or 210 g ai ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–266 · show in text ↑
e2

“injury at this timing was transient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–553 · show in text ↑
e3

“to wheat at the PRE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was not reduced by early spring metribuzin application.

Treatment
metribuzine1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
not reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“metribuzin was applied at 105 or 210 g ai ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–266 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield was not reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–579 · show in text ↑
e3

“to wheat at the PRE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss was observed with the other metribuzin application timings in at least one of three years.

Treatment
metribuzine1
Outcome
Yield losse2
Direction
losse2
Qualifier
in at least one out of three yearse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“metribuzin was applied at 105 or 210 g ai ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–266 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield loss was observed with the other application timings in at least one out of three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–674 · show in text ↑
e3

“to wheat at the PRE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–289 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall shortly after application appears to increase the risk of wheat injury.

Treatment
Rainfall shortly after applicatione1
Outcome
risk of wheat injurye1
Direction
increasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rainfall shortly after application appears to increase the risk of wheat injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–755 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.