Paper · 2016 · Zemdirbyste-Agriculture

The influence of primary soil tillage, deep loosening and organic fertilizers on weed incidence in crops

Regina Skuodienė; Danutė Karčauskienė; Regina Repšienė

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Little is known about the influence of deep loosening and its combination with primary soil tillage and organic fertilizers on weed incidence in crops. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of different soil tillage methods and their combinations with deep loosening and organic fertilizers on the weed incidence in a crop rotation. An experiment was carried out at Vaiiai Branch of Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry during the period 2012-2015 in a four-course crop rotation: winter wheat spring rape spring barley with undersown red clover red clover. The soil of the experimental site is Dystri-Epihypogleyic Albeluvisol (ABg-p-w-dy) with a sandy loam texture. Soil tillage methods (conventional ploughing, shallow ploughing, shallow ploughless tillage), organic fertilizers (without organic fertilizers, straw, green manure 1 st cut + straw, green manure 2 nd cut + straw, farmyard manure 40 t ha -1 + straw) and deep loosening impact on weed incidence was very unequal during the experimental years and depended on plant growth and development conditions. In all experimental years, primary tillage had the main influence on the examined indicators of weed incidence (weed number and dry mass). Significantly greater number and mass of weeds were established in shallow ploughed soil. Organic fertilizers did not have any significant influence on the indicators of weed incidence; however, the use of red clover of the first cut for green manure tended to reduce weed number in the crops of the rotation during the first half of the plant growing season. A significant influence of a onetime deep loosening was observed in the first year. After improving soil aeration and humidity conditions, weed number and dry mass were significantly greater, compared to unloosened plots. The interaction between deep loosening and soil tillage methods had a great effect as well. Having used deep loosening in shallow ploughless tillage treatments, the weed number was greater compared to deeply ploughed soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow ploughing yielded significantly greater weed number and mass.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
shallow ploughed soile0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number and mass of weedse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly greater number and mass of weeds were established in shallow ploughed soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1325 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat spring rape spring barley with undersown red clover red clover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizers had no significant influence on weed-incidence indicators.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Organic fertilizerse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
indicators of weed incidencee0
Direction
did not have any significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic fertilizers did not have any significant influence on the indicators of weed incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat spring rape spring barley with undersown red clover red clover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-cut red clover green manure tended to reduce weed number early in the growing season.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
red clover of the first cut for green manuree0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed numbere0
Direction
reducee0
Qualifier
first half of the plant growing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of red clover of the first cut for green manure tended to reduce weed number in the crops of the rotation during the first half of the plant growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep loosening increased weed number and dry mass significantly in the first year versus unloosened plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
onetime deep looseninge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed number and dry masse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
first yeare0
Comparator
unloosened plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant influence of a onetime deep loosening was observed in the first year. After improving soil aeration and humidity conditions, weed number and dry mass were significantly greater, compared to unloosened plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1817 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat spring rape spring barley with undersown red clover red clover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep loosening with shallow ploughless tillage produced more weeds than deeply ploughed soil.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
deep loosening in shallow ploughless tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed numbere0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
deeply ploughed soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Having used deep loosening in shallow ploughless tillage treatments, the weed number was greater compared to deeply ploughed soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2040 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat spring rape spring barley with undersown red clover red clover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–589 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

fertilization · weed · Trifolium pratense (red clover)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.