Paper · 2017 · CSA News

Comparing Green Manures in No‐till Crop Sequence

Tracy Hmielowski

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Interseeded clover. Photo courtesy of Heather Karsten. Farmers use “green manure” to protect soil, fix nitrogen, and scavenge nutrients when cash crops are not present. These cover crops can also reduce weeds and act as a mulch for cash crops in no-till systems. Because of the increasing use of cover crops in no-till systems, researchers at Penn State recently compared two green manure cover crops, red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth). “One of the reasons that we compared these was that farmers have started interseeding red clover,” says ASA member Heather Karsten, Associate Professor of Crop Production/Ecology. Interseeding, she explains, is also called relay cropping where farmers frost seed or drill red clover into a small grain very early in the spring. Karsten is a co-author on a study recently published in Agronomy Journal, titled “Green Manure Comparison between Winter Wheat and Corn: Weeds, Yields, and Economics.” The authors report that red clover treatments were more profitable than hairy vetch due to increased cash crop yield and reduced herbicide application. Dr. William Curran, Weed Extension Specialist and ASA member, had done prior research using hairy vetch in organic farming systems. As a co-author on this paper, Curran says, “I went into this thinking hairy vetch would be the winner … the results of this study surprised me a little bit.” The experiment was conducted at the Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Station in Pennsylvania. From 2010 to 2013, green manures were used in a winter cereal–green manure–corn silage rotation. As Karsten mentioned, the red clover treatment was interseeded into the cereal grain crop whereas the hairy vetch, which was combined with triticale, was planted after the wheat harvest. Red clover was harvested for hay in late fall before corn was planted the following spring, and both cover crop treatments were terminated with herbicide in spring prior to corn planting. Corn yields were consistently greater in red clover treatments. The difference was significant in 2012 and 2013 when corn yields were 16 and 9% greater, respectively, in red clover treatments compared with hairy vetch. “We don't have all the explanations for why,” admits Karsten, but she says in 2012 and 2013, corn populations were significantly higher after red clover, and corn pest populations appear to be the culprits although there may also have been more nitrogen available from clover. View the open access Agronomy Journal article, “Green Manure Comparison between Winter Wheat and Corn: Weeds, Yields, and Economics,” online at https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.02.0084 There was little difference in weed control, measured as weed biomass, between the two green manure treatments. However, red clover required fewer herbicide applications in the spring, amounting to a 28% reduction in herbicide active ingredient use. “Anytime you can use less herbicide, it's an advantage,” says Curran, both economically by reducing costs, and ecologically by reducing selection for herbicide-resistant weed biotypes. The economic benefits of increased yield, reduced herbicide, and harvesting red clover as forage were calculated as $1,355/ha more in net returns compared with hairy vetch. Even without the harvest of red clover for forage, the red clover treatments would have $123/ha greater profit than hairy vetch. The results of this study may lead more farmers, agronomic consultants, and educators to consider the use of red clover as a green manure. “I know of conventional and organic dairy and grain farmers in Pennsylvania and New York who relay crop red clover into wheat before corn,” Karsten says. “And now, we have multiple reasons to recommend red clover over hairy vetch to more growers.” Although red clover was the higher-performing green manure in this system, the authors point out that there are some limitations. Karsten explains that if wheat fields have high weed pressure, “then this interseeding might not be the best practice, but if weed populations are manageable and the typical sequence does involve rotating to corn, then we think this is a good strategy.” Cover crops are not a cure-all and need to be used strategically. Before starting to use green manure, Curran advises farmers to “really think through the process,” meaning that farmers should take into account what benefits they hope to gain from using a green manure and how they will manage both the green manure and cash crops throughout the growing season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red clover green manure treatments were more profitable than hairy vetch.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
red clover treatmentse0
Outcome
profitablee0
Direction
more profitablee0
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The authors report that red clover treatments were more profitable than hairy vetch due to increased cash crop yield and reduced herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yields were consistently greater in red clover treatments than in hairy vetch treatments.

Treatment
red clover treatmentse1
Outcome
Corn yieldse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared two green manure cover crops, red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn yields were consistently greater in red clover treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1986–2048 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield was 16% greater in red clover treatments than in hairy vetch in 2012, a significant difference.

Treatment
red clover treatmentse0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
16e0
Qualifier
2012e0
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference was significant in 2012 and 2013 when corn yields were 16 and 9% greater, respectively, in red clover treatments compared with hairy vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield was 9% greater in red clover treatments than in hairy vetch in 2013, a significant difference.

Treatment
red clover treatmentse0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
9%e0
Qualifier
2013e0
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference was significant in 2012 and 2013 when corn yields were 16 and 9% greater, respectively, in red clover treatments compared with hairy vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn populations were significantly higher after red clover than after hairy vetch in 2012 and 2013.

Treatment
red clovere1
Outcome
corn populationse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
2012 and 2013e1
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared two green manure cover crops, red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“she says in 2012 and 2013, corn populations were significantly higher after red clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2271–2357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was little difference in weed biomass between the red clover and hairy vetch green manure treatments.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
green manure treatmentse1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
little differencee1
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared two green manure cover crops, red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was little difference in weed control, measured as weed biomass, between the two green manure treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2669–2779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red clover required 28% less herbicide active ingredient than hairy vetch in spring, with fewer herbicide applications.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee1
Treatment
red clovere1
Outcome
herbicide applicationse1
Direction
fewere1
Value
28%e1
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared two green manure cover crops, red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“red clover required fewer herbicide applications in the spring, amounting to a 28% reduction in herbicide active ingredient use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2790–2917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting red clover as forage gave $1,355/ha more in net returns than hairy vetch.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
harvesting red clover as foragee0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
moree0
Value
$1,355/hae0
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economic benefits of increased yield, reduced herbicide, and harvesting red clover as forage were calculated as $1,355/ha more in net returns compared with hairy vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3104–3275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Without forage harvest, red clover treatments would have $123/ha greater profit than hairy vetch.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
red clover treatmentse0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
greatere0
Value
$123/hae0
Qualifier
Even without the harvest of red clover for foragee0
Comparator
hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even without the harvest of red clover for forage, the red clover treatments would have $123/ha greater profit than hairy vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3277–3404 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend red clover over hairy vetch as a green manure for more growers.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Outcome
recommend red clover over hairy vetche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we have multiple reasons to recommend red clover over hairy vetch to more growers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3709–3790 · show in text ↑

Trifolium pratense · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · weed · Trifolium pratense (red clover)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.