Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Deep loosening with shallow ploughless tillage produced more weeds than deeply ploughed soil.

A claim from The influence of primary soil tillage, deep loosening and organic fertilizers on weed incidence in crops · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep loosening with shallow ploughless tillage produced more weeds than deeply ploughed soil.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
deep loosening in shallow ploughless tillage treatmentse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed numbere0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
deeply ploughed soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Having used deep loosening in shallow ploughless tillage treatments, the weed number was greater compared to deeply ploughed soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2040
e1

“winter wheat spring rape spring barley with undersown red clover red clover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–589

Title

The influence of primary soil tillage, deep loosening and organic fertilizers on weed incidence in crops

Regina Skuodienė; Danutė Karčauskienė; Regina Repšienė Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2016. doi:10.13080/z-a.2016.103.018

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-a664fe8fd089cbaaced4b8e4d2d711e9ff26c67a06c1200502d1ec45c5ba6b8a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

174 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.