Paper · 2012

Evaluation of rootstocks for watermelon grafting with reference to plant development, yield and fruit quality

N. Ionia

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of grafting and post-grafting temperature on the plant development of two watermelon cultivars at transplantation and on subsequent fruit quality was studied. Watermelon cv. Sugar Baby and Crimson Sweet were self-rooted or grafted onto rootstock RS 841 F1 (Cucurbita maxima × C. moschata) or bottlegourd [Lagenaria siceraria f. clavata] (year 1), plus L. siceraria f. pyrotheca (year 2). After grafting, plants were held at 8 o C or 16 o C (minimum) until transplantation (28-29 days), at which stage growth was compared with that of the self-rooted control held under the same conditions. Plants were planted in the field and fruit quality assessed at harvest. At the time of transplantation in year 1, plants at 16 o C were taller and had a higher total fresh weight than those at 8 o C. The grafted plants of both cultivars were taller and had a higher leaf area and fresh weight than the self-rooted plants, irrespective of rootstock. In year 2, the grafted plants of both cultivars had better development (height, leaf area, leaf number, fresh weight) than self-rooted plants. The plants of Crimson Sweet × L. siceraria f. pyrotheca were taller than those of the other two scion-rootstock combinations, irrespective of temperature. Mean fruit weight at harvest was higher in grafted plants than in self-rooted plants, and sugar content varied with scion-rootstock combination. Grafting of watermelon results in better plant growth by the time of transplantation, whereas the scion-rootstock combination affects fruit quality. A minimum temperature of 16 o C is indicated during the post-grafting stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At transplantation in year 1, plants at 16°C were taller and had higher fresh weight than plants at 8°C.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
16 o Ce0
Outcome
taller and had a higher total fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
year 1e0
Comparator
8 o Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the time of transplantation in year 1, plants at 16 o C were taller and had a higher total fresh weight than those at 8 o C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year 1, grafted plants of both watermelon cultivars were taller and had greater leaf area and fresh weight than self-rooted plants regardless of rootstock.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
taller and had a higher leaf area and fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
irrespective of rootstocke0
Comparator
self-rooted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grafted plants of both cultivars were taller and had a higher leaf area and fresh weight than the self-rooted plants, irrespective of rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In year 2, grafted plants of both cultivars developed better in height, leaf area, leaf number, and fresh weight than self-rooted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
development (height, leaf area, leaf number, fresh weight)e0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
year 2e0
Comparator
self-rooted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 2, the grafted plants of both cultivars had better development (height, leaf area, leaf number, fresh weight) than self-rooted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crimson Sweet grafted onto L. siceraria f. pyrotheca was taller than the other scion-rootstock combinations regardless of temperature.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Material
Crimson Sweete0
Treatment
Crimson Sweet × L. siceraria f. pyrothecae0
Outcome
tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Qualifier
irrespective of temperaturee0
Comparator
the other two scion-rootstock combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants of Crimson Sweet × L. siceraria f. pyrotheca were taller than those of the other two scion-rootstock combinations, irrespective of temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted watermelon plants had higher mean fruit weight at harvest than self-rooted plants.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
Mean fruit weight at harveste0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
self-rooted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean fruit weight at harvest was higher in grafted plants than in self-rooted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon fruit sugar content varied with the scion-rootstock combination.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
scion-rootstock combinatione0
Outcome
sugar contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar content varied with scion-rootstock combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–48 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors indicate a minimum post-grafting temperature of 16°C for watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
post-grafting stagee0
Outcome
A minimum temperature of 16 o Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A minimum temperature of 16 o C is indicated during the post-grafting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–48 · show in text ↑

Lagenaria siceraria · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Grafting increased watermelon fruit size.

    Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting · 2007 · compared with non-grafted control

    Same directionCited by this paper

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.