Paper · 2000 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Growth and Variations in Proline, Sodium, Chloride, Phosphorus and Potassium Concentrations of Chickpea ( Cicer arietinumL. cvs.) Varieties Under Salinity Stress

Hesna Özcan; Murat Ali Turan; Özlem Koç; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Under salinity stress, growth and variations in proline, Na, Cl, P and K concentrations of three chickpea varieties (Canitez- 87, ILC-195/2 and Damla), which are cultivated widely in Turkey, were investigated. For this purpose, experimental soil was salinized with 68 mmol kg -1NaCl. The salinity responses of chickpea varieties were compared by means of various plant parameters. According to the results, Damla was affected by salinity stress much more than Canitez-87 and ILC-195/2 cultivars. However, under salinity stress, the dry weight of the Damla variety was influenced much less than the others. Sodium and Cl contents were generally found to be lower than those of the others. Proline, Na, Cl and P concentrations of all varieties were increased, and the K concentration was decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damla was affected by salinity stress much more than Canitez-87 and ILC-195/2

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Damlae1
Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
affectede1
Direction
much moree1
Comparator
Canitez-87 and ILC-195/2 cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinumL. cvs.) Varieties Under Salinity Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“According to the results, Damla was affected by salinity stress much more than Canitez-87 and ILC-195/2 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity stress, dry weight of Damla was influenced much less than that of the other varieties

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Damla varietye2
Treatment
salinity stresse2
Outcome
dry weighte2
Direction
much lesse2
Comparator
the otherse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinumL. cvs.) Varieties Under Salinity Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–161 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, under salinity stress, the dry weight of the Damla variety was influenced much less than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium and chloride contents were generally lower than in the other varieties under salinity

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Under salinity stresse5
Outcome
Sodium and Cl contentse3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
those of the otherse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinumL. cvs.) Varieties Under Salinity Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–161 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sodium and Cl contents were generally found to be lower than those of the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–686 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under salinity stress, growth and variations in proline, Na, Cl, P and K concentrations of three chickpea varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline, sodium and chloride concentrations increased under salinity stress

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Under salinity stresse5
Outcome
Proline, Na, Cle4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinumL. cvs.) Varieties Under Salinity Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–161 · show in text ↑
e4

“Proline, Na, Cl and P concentrations of all varieties were increased, and the K concentration was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–795 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under salinity stress, growth and variations in proline, Na, Cl, P and K concentrations of three chickpea varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus concentration increased under salinity stress

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Under salinity stresse5
Outcome
P concentrationse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinumL. cvs.) Varieties Under Salinity Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–161 · show in text ↑
e4

“Proline, Na, Cl and P concentrations of all varieties were increased, and the K concentration was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–795 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under salinity stress, growth and variations in proline, Na, Cl, P and K concentrations of three chickpea varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium concentration decreased under salinity stress

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Under salinity stresse5
Outcome
K concentratione4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea ( Cicer arietinumL. cvs.) Varieties Under Salinity Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–161 · show in text ↑
e4

“Proline, Na, Cl and P concentrations of all varieties were increased, and the K concentration was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–795 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under salinity stress, growth and variations in proline, Na, Cl, P and K concentrations of three chickpea varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.