Paper · 2011

Hormesis Influence of Glyphosate in Between Increasing Growth, Yield and Controlling Weeds in Faba Bean

T. A. El-Shahawy; Faida Sharara

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigates the response of faba bean and associated weeds to the low rates of glyphosate (1.4, 2.8, 5.6, 11.2, 22.4, 44.8, and 89.6 g a.i./feddan) corresponding to 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8, 9.6, and 19.2% of the usage rate (0.467 kg/feddan), respectively. Two field experiments were conducted in this regard during two successive seasons (2008/2009-2009/2010). The plants were sprayed once and twice, 5 and 15 weeks after sowing. Generally, the one foliar application treatments were more effective in increasing faba bean growth than the two foliar application treatments. The best results obtained were for the concentration 11.2 g/feddan, especially sprayed as once. Plant height, fresh and dry weight as well as yield and its components were significantly increased in response. Total protein and carbohydrate contents were unaffected by the treatments. Weeds in converse were negatively affected recording the highest inhibition rate at the concentration 11.2 g sprayed also as once. It has been suggested that the low doses of glyphosate can induce faba bean growth, and this could indirectly affect weeds growth. (El-Shahawy, T.A. and Faida A.A. Sharara. Hormesis Influence of Glyphosate in Between Increasing Growth, Yield and Controlling Weeds in Faba Bean. Journal of American Science 2011;7(2):139-144). (ISSN: 1545-1003).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One glyphosate foliar application increased faba bean growth more than two applications.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
one foliar applicatione1
Outcome
faba bean growthe1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
two foliar application treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of faba bean and associated weeds to the low rates of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Generally, the one foliar application treatments were more effective in increasing faba bean growth than the two foliar application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 11.2 g/feddan glyphosate concentration gave the best results.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
concentration 11.2 g/feddane2
Outcome
best results obtainede2
Direction
beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of faba bean and associated weeds to the low rates of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“The best results obtained were for the concentration 11.2 g/feddan, especially sprayed as once”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low glyphosate rates significantly increased plant height, fresh weight and dry weight of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
low rates of glyphosatee0
Outcome
Plant height, fresh and dry weighte3
Direction
significantly increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of faba bean and associated weeds to the low rates of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant height, fresh and dry weight as well as yield and its components were significantly increased in response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low glyphosate rates significantly increased yield and its components in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
low rates of glyphosatee0
Outcome
yield and its componentse3
Direction
significantly increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of faba bean and associated weeds to the low rates of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant height, fresh and dry weight as well as yield and its components were significantly increased in response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low glyphosate rates did not change total protein and carbohydrate contents of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
low rates of glyphosatee0
Outcome
Total protein and carbohydrate contentse4
Direction
unaffectede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of faba bean and associated weeds to the low rates of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Total protein and carbohydrate contents were unaffected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 11.2 g/feddan glyphosate application sprayed once gave the highest weed inhibition rate.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
concentration 11.2 g sprayed also as oncee5
Interactor
Weedse5weed
Outcome
inhibition ratee5
Direction
negatively affectede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of faba bean and associated weeds to the low rates of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“Weeds in converse were negatively affected recording the highest inhibition rate at the concentration 11.2 g sprayed also as once”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–999 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low glyphosate doses may induce faba bean growth, which could indirectly affect weed growth.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
low doses of glyphosatee6
Outcome
weeds growthe6
Qualifier
induce faba bean growthe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response of faba bean and associated weeds to the low rates of glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“It has been suggested that the low doses of glyphosate can induce faba bean growth, and this could indirectly affect weeds growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1130 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

glyphosate · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

glyphosate · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 58 positive, 8 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.