Abstract
Irrigation water shortage, traditional irrigation systems and poor soils in arid regions and some other factors have their negative impacts on crops production amount, energy used in processing, exportation and importation of fertilizers. Field experiments were carried out through the growing season (2012/2013) in sandy soil at the Experimental Farm of National Research Center (NRC), ElNoubaria Governor, Egypt, to study the effect of some localized irrigation systems (LIS) and humic fertilizer (HF) on water use efficiency (WUE), and fertilizer use efficiency (FUE) of maize crop. Three localized irrigation systems were used: mini-sprinkler irrigation system (MSIS), bubbler irrigation systems (BIS), and drip irrigation system (DIS). The humic fertilizer treatments were: (HF100), (HF50), (HF0): (50, 25; 0 kg fed, on ranking). N, P2O5 and K2O were applied via irrigation water (Fertigation) at the rate of 60.71 and 69 kg fedin doses according to growth stage. The research work concludes that the agriculture activities should be interest in produce more crop by choosing of both irrigation system and humic fertilizers. Data obtained indicated that the Bubbler irrigation system and humic fertilizer selection treatment (HF100) can positively affect some Maize productivity parameters such as grain yield, Stover yield, water use efficiency, and fertilize use efficiency, and physical of Maize crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Bubbler irrigation with HF100 positively affected maize grain yield and stover yield.
- Treatment
- Bubbler irrigation system and humic fertilizer selection treatment (HF100)e0
- Outcome
- grain yield, Stover yielde0
- Direction
- positively affecte0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the Bubbler irrigation system and humic fertilizer selection treatment (HF100) can positively affect some Maize productivity parameters such as grain yield, Stover yield, water use efficiency, and fertilize use efficiency, and physical of Maize crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bubbler irrigation with HF100 positively affected maize water-use and fertilizer-use efficiency.
- Treatment
- Bubbler irrigation system and humic fertilizer selection treatment (HF100)e0
- Outcome
- water use efficiency, and fertilize use efficiencye0
- Direction
- positively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the Bubbler irrigation system and humic fertilizer selection treatment (HF100) can positively affect some Maize productivity parameters such as grain yield, Stover yield, water use efficiency, and fertilize use efficiency, and physical of Maize crop.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bubbler irrigation with HF100 positively affected physical maize properties, without further specification.
- Treatment
- Bubbler irrigation system and humic fertilizer selection treatment (HF100)e0
- Outcome
- physical of Maize crope0
- Direction
- positively affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the Bubbler irrigation system and humic fertilizer selection treatment (HF100) can positively affect some Maize productivity parameters such as grain yield, Stover yield, water use efficiency, and fertilize use efficiency, and physical of Maize crop.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
158 papers more in this group
See all 162 papers →other · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →other · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →irrigation · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →fertilization · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
249 papers more in this group
See all 253 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
320 papers more in this group
See all 324 papers →irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.