Paper · 2008

New approaches in pest and disease control in Sicilian greenhouses

Giovanna Tropea Garzia; Gaetano Siscaro; G. Polizzi; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Results of trials on mechanical methods to release beneficials and on new techniques to apply sulphur are reported. The former were carried out on two predators, a phytoseiid mite and an anthocorid bug. Laboratory and greenhouse tests were conducted with the aim of evaluating the vitality and the damage eventually caused and setting the machine. The latter dealt with new techniques of sulphur application on tomato crops using dispensers transforming granular sulphur into vapour. In order to evaluate the effects of sublimated sulphur both on fungal diseases and arthropod pests, different trials have been carried out. The incidence and the severity index for airborne pathogens were bi-weekly evaluated and the infestations caused by some of the most relevant pests have been regularly monitored. Moreover, the incidence of the viral disease TYLCD has been evaluated. During the trials on mechanical methods, no physical damage to the beneficials was observed. The distribution in laboratory seems to be suitable for applications in biological control programs, and the results on protected sweet pepper crops showed a better spatial distribution and a more effective interaction beneficials/preys in the “mechanically released” plots than in the “manually released” ones. The trials on sublimated sulphur confirmed the good effectiveness of the technique in controlling natural infection of tomato powdery mildew as well as a moderate efficacy on tomato late blight. A good protection has been registered in the case of arthropod pests: the tomato russet mite was totally controlled; appreciable results were also obtained on phytophagous insects. A significant reduction in viral infections was also observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical release caused no observed physical damage to the beneficial predators.

Taxon
sweet pepper cropsCapsicum annuume1
Outcome
no physical damage to the beneficialse0
Direction
no physical damagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the trials on mechanical methods, no physical damage to the beneficials was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“protected sweet pepper crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1115 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laboratory distribution of mechanically released predators appeared suitable for biological control programs.

Taxon
sweet pepper cropsCapsicum annuume1
Outcome
distribution in laboratory seems to be suitablee0
Value
suitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution in laboratory seems to be suitable for applications in biological control programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1066 · show in text ↑
e1

“protected sweet pepper crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanically released beneficials had better spatial distribution than manually released beneficials on protected sweet pepper.

Taxon
sweet pepper cropsCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
mechanically releasede0
Outcome
spatial distributione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
manually releasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the results on protected sweet pepper crops showed a better spatial distribution and a more effective interaction beneficials/preys in the “mechanically released” plots than in the “manually released” ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanically released beneficials had a more effective interaction with prey than manually released ones on protected sweet pepper.

Taxon
sweet pepper cropsCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
mechanically releasede0
Outcome
interaction beneficials/preyse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
manually releasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the results on protected sweet pepper crops showed a better spatial distribution and a more effective interaction beneficials/preys in the “mechanically released” plots than in the “manually released” ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sublimated sulphur effectively controlled natural tomato powdery mildew infection.

Treatment
sublimated sulphure0
Outcome
natural infection of tomato powdery mildewe0
Direction
good effectivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trials on sublimated sulphur confirmed the good effectiveness of the technique in controlling natural infection of tomato powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sublimated sulphur had moderate efficacy against tomato late blight.

Treatment
sublimated sulphure0
Outcome
tomato late blighte0
Direction
moderate efficacye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sublimated sulphur confirmed the good effectiveness of the technique in controlling natural infection of tomato powdery mildew as well as a moderate efficacy on tomato late blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sublimated sulphur totally controlled tomato russet mite.

Treatment
sublimated sulphure1
Interactor
tomato russet mitee0pest
Outcome
tomato russet mitee0
Direction
totally controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tomato russet mite was totally controlled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1589 · show in text ↑
e1

“The trials on sublimated sulphur confirmed the good effectiveness of the technique in controlling natural infection of tomato powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sublimated sulphur produced appreciable control of phytophagous insects on tomato.

Treatment
sublimated sulphure1
Interactor
phytophagous insectse0pest
Outcome
phytophagous insectse0
Direction
appreciablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“appreciable results were also obtained on phytophagous insects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1653 · show in text ↑
e1

“The trials on sublimated sulphur confirmed the good effectiveness of the technique in controlling natural infection of tomato powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sublimated sulphur trials showed a significant reduction in viral infections on tomato.

Treatment
sublimated sulphure1
Outcome
viral infectionse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant reduction in viral infections was also observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1717 · show in text ↑
e1

“The trials on sublimated sulphur confirmed the good effectiveness of the technique in controlling natural infection of tomato powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1419 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sulfur atom · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.