Paper · 2011

EVALUATING OF DROUGHT STRESS TOLERANCE BASED ON SELECTION INDICES IN TURKISH BREAD WHEAT LANDRACES

Bahri Dagdas

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of several selection indices to identify drought tolerant/resis tant genotypes under different conditions of Konya. Thirtysix bread wheat genotypes (twenty four pure lines from Turkish bread wheat landraces and twelve modern bread wheat cultivars) were evaluated under both moisture stress (rainfed) and non stress (irr igated) conditions using arandomized complete block designwith three replications. Nine drought tolerance indices including yield stability index (YSI), yield index (YI), superiority index (P i), stress tolerance index (STI), geometric mean productivity (GMP), stress susceptibility index (SSI), mean productivity (MP), stress tolerance (TOL), harmonic mean (HM) and linear regression coefficient (b i) were calculated. The indices were adjusted based on grain yield un der drought condition (Ys) andnormal conditions (Yp). SSI is suggested as useful indicator for wheat breeding where the stress is severe while MP, GMP, TOL HM and STI are suggested if the stress is less severe. Biplot analysis was used to explain relationship between grain yield and drought indices. Karahan-99, Bayraktar-2000, Gerek- 79, PL-7, Snmez-2000, K�1raA -66 and PL-5were the superior genotypes for both rainfed an d irrigated conditions with high PC1 and low PC2.PL-25, PL-13 and PL-23with high PC2 were more suitable for rainfed than irrigated conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

SSI was suggested as a useful wheat breeding indicator under severe stress.

Outcome
SSI is suggested as useful indicatore0
Qualifier
where the stress is severee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSI is suggested as useful indicator for wheat breeding where the stress is severe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–982 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

MP, GMP, TOL, HM, and STI were suggested for less severe stress.

Outcome
MP, GMP, TOL HM and STI are suggestede0
Qualifier
if the stress is less severee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MP, GMP, TOL HM and STI are suggested if the stress is less severe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karahan-99, Bayraktar-2000, Gerek- 79, PL-7, Snmez-2000, K�1raA -66 and PL-5 were superior under rainfed and irrigated conditions, with high PC1 and low PC2.

Material
Karahan-99, Bayraktar-2000, Gerek- 79, PL-7, Snmez-2000, K�1raA -66 and PL-5e0
Outcome
superior genotypes for both rainfed an d irrigated conditionse0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
high PC1 and low PC2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Karahan-99, Bayraktar-2000, Gerek- 79, PL-7, Snmez-2000, K�1raA -66 and PL-5were the superior genotypes for both rainfed an d irrigated conditions with high PC1 and low PC2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PL-25, PL-13 and PL-23 were more suitable for rainfed than irrigated conditions.

Material
PL-25, PL-13 and PL-23e0
Outcome
suitable for rainfed than irrigated conditionse0
Direction
more suitablee0
Qualifier
high PC2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PL-25, PL-13 and PL-23with high PC2 were more suitable for rainfed than irrigated conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑