Paper · 2014

EFFECT OF SOLE AND COMBINED INOCULATION OF RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM AND MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON TOMATO

Partha Ghosh; Sikha Dutta; West Bengal

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of Meloidogyne javanica alone and in different combination with Ralstonia solanacearum on tomato were investigated. The highest shoot length reduction (32.1%) was at the highest density of both the parasites over control. The highest initial population density of M. javanica was solely responsible for the highest root length reduction (33.25%) and shoot dry weight reduction (67.44%). The highest density of R. solanacearum is solely responsible for root fresh weight reduction (22.28-30.85%) irrespective of M. javanica densities. Higher density of M. javanica produced higher root fresh weight (1.69 - 1.96 g) in the absence of R. solanacearum over control (1.75 g). The gall intensity was dose dependent in absence of R. solanacearum. However, in the presence of R. solanacearum at its higher density, M. javanica produced lowest number of galls (20.9-34.7). The synergistic effects on percent wilt incidences (52 - 95%) were more prominent at lower levels of R. solanacearum population with pathogenic levels of M. javanica. Conclusively, the role of M. javanica is synergistic only if the density of R. solanacearum is lower than 105 cfug-1 soil, however, higher R. solanacearum population (107-109 cfug-1 soil) drastically inhibits the activity of root-knot nematode in the rhizosphere.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined high densities reduced shoot length by 32.1%.

Treatment
highest density of both the parasitese0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
32.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest shoot length reduction (32.1%) was at the highest density of both the parasites over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–233 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest nematode density reduced root length by 33.25%.

Treatment
highest initial population density of M. javanicae0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
33.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest initial population density of M. javanica was solely responsible for the highest root length reduction (33.25%) and shoot dry weight reduction (67.44%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest nematode density reduced shoot dry weight by 67.44%.

Treatment
highest initial population density of M. javanicae0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
67.44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest initial population density of M. javanica was solely responsible for the highest root length reduction (33.25%) and shoot dry weight reduction (67.44%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest bacterial density reduced root fresh weight by 22.28-30.85%.

Treatment
highest density of R. solanacearume0
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
22.28-30.85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest density of R. solanacearum is solely responsible for root fresh weight reduction (22.28-30.85%) irrespective of M. javanica densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nematode density raised root fresh weight without the bacterium.

Treatment
Higher density of M. javanicae0
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.69 - 1.96 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher density of M. javanica produced higher root fresh weight (1.69 - 1.96 g) in the absence of R. solanacearum over control (1.75 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–682 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gall intensity depended on nematode dose without the bacterium.

Treatment
R. solanacearume0
Outcome
gall intensitye0
Qualifier
dose dependente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The gall intensity was dose dependent in absence of R. solanacearum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher bacterial density, nematode gall counts were lowest.

Treatment
R. solanacearum at its higher densitye0
Outcome
M. javanica produced lowest number of gallse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
20.9-34.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, in the presence of R. solanacearum at its higher density, M. javanica produced lowest number of galls (20.9-34.7).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–875 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined infection had synergistic wilt incidence of 52 - 95% at lower bacterial densities.

Treatment
lower levels of R. solanacearum population with pathogenic levels of M. javanicae0
Outcome
percent wilt incidencese0
Direction
more prominente0
Value
52 - 95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The synergistic effects on percent wilt incidences (52 - 95%) were more prominent at lower levels of R. solanacearum population with pathogenic levels of M. javanica.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1042 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode synergy occurred only below a bacterial density threshold.

Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
Outcome
role of M. javanica is synergistice0
Value
105 cfug-1 soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“the role of M. javanica is synergistic only if the density of R. solanacearum is lower than 105 cfug-1 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High bacterial populations inhibited root-knot nematode activity.

Treatment
higher R. solanacearum populatione0
Outcome
activity of root-knot nematodee0
Direction
inhibitse0
Value
107-109 cfug-1 soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher R. solanacearum population (107-109 cfug-1 soil) drastically inhibits the activity of root-knot nematode in the rhizosphere.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1306 · show in text ↑

Ralstonia solanacearum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Meloidogyne javanica · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.