Intervention effectmodel-written summary

RS inoculation significantly inhibited tomato seedling growth.

A claim from Compost Amendments Based on Vinegar Residue Promote Tomato Growth and Suppress Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia Solanacearum · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RS inoculation significantly inhibited tomato seedling growth.

Treatment
RS inoculatione0
Interactor
RSe0pathogen
Outcome
growth of tomato seedlingse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, the RS inoculation significantly inhibited the growth of tomato seedlings, and all growth indices of plants grown in VRS were considerably higher than those produced in Peat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1719

Title

Compost Amendments Based on Vinegar Residue Promote Tomato Growth and Suppress Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia Solanacearum

Mingming He; Mohammad Shah Jahan; Yu Wang; et al. Pathogens 2020. doi:10.3390/pathogens9030227

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-d3fcd853a9faaa9a236725d0f7ab830276c448fcac15cdd88db2e68a40a40202 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

Ralstonia solanacearum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    aRS and MRS alone or in combination promoted plant growth compared with control

    Combined use of a microbial restoration substrate and avirulent Ralstonia solanacearum for the control of tomato bacterial wilt · 2019 · compared with control (CK, non-aRS or MRS)

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    R. solanacearum treatment did not affect dgt root length.

    Pleiotropic Phenotypes of the Tomato diageotropica Mutant Enable Resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum · 2025

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    After R. solanacearum inoculation, callus deposition in slsnat2 is notably lower than in MT.

    Serotonin N-acetyltransferase SlSNAT2 Positively Regulates Tomato Resistance Against Ralstonia solanacearum · 2025 · compared with MT

    Same direction

  4. negative
    Highest bacterial density reduced root fresh weight by 22.28-30.85%.

    EFFECT OF SOLE AND COMBINED INOCULATION OF RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM AND MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON TOMATO · 2014

    Same direction

  5. negative
    That sequence reduced tomato plant height by 24.99%.

    REACTION OF TOMATO (SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM) CULTIVARS TOWARDS ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE (MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA) AND BACTERIAL WILT (RALSTONIA SOLANACEARUM) · 2019

    Same direction

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this claim · 387 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Co-inoculation increased greenhouse shoot dry weight of tomato by 68% versus control.

    Co‐inoculation of Glomus intraradices and Trichoderma atroviride acts as a biostimulant to promote growth, yield and nutrient uptake of vegetable crops · 2014 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Approximately 1 × 10 8 cfu∙mL −1 was required to maximize tomato root growth, lower than the inoculum density for shoot growth.

    Inoculum density, temperature, and genotype effects on in vitro growth promotion and epiphytic and endophytic colonization of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumL.) seedlings inoculated with a pseudomonad bacterium · 1997 · compared with shoot growth

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    MO1 inoculation significantly increased tomato growth attributes under normal and saline conditions (120 mM NaCl).

    Indole-3-acetic-acid and ACC deaminase producing Leclercia adecarboxylata MO1 improves Solanum lycopersicum L. growth and salinity stress tolerance by endogenous secondary metabolites regulation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    SQR-T037 inoculation significantly improved tomato seedling biomass and nutrient uptake in nutrient limiting soil.

    Solubilisation of Phosphate and Micronutrients by Trichoderma harzianum and Its Relationship with the Promotion of Tomato Plant Growth · 2015

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    T. harzianum inoculation increased tomato root and shoot growth versus uninoculated and drought-stressed plants.

    Increased resistance of drought by Trichoderma harzianum fungal treatment correlates with increased secondary metabolites and proline content · 2017 · compared with uninoculated controls as well as drought stressed plants

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Inoculation with Streptomyces strain S30 promoted tomato seedling growth.

    Isolation and characterization of endophytic Streptomyces strains from surface-sterilized tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots · 2004

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Of the bacterial isolates reintroduced into tomato, 61% promoted plant growth.

    Characterization of culturable bacterial endophytes and their capacity to promote plant growth from plants grown using organic or conventional practices · 2015

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Metarhizium anisopliae isolates significantly increased tomato plant height and root length compared with untreated control.

    Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin Promotes Growth and Has Endophytic Activity in Tomato Plants · 2011 · compared with untreated control

    Opposite direction

432 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.