Paper · 2004 · Letters in Applied Microbiology

Isolation and characterization of endophytic Streptomyces strains from surface-sterilized tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots

L. Cao; Z. Qiu; J. You; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
180
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AIMS: To isolate endophytic Streptomyces strains from tomato and examine their antimicrobial activity. METHODS: Endophytic Streptomyces strains were isolated using surface-sterilization methods and identified by morphological characteristics. Antimicrobial activities were measured by the agar plate sensitivity method. Antifungal activity in vivo was measured by seedling mortality in infested soils. RESULTS: Twenty-one per cent of endophytic streptomycete isolates produced antibacterial metabolites and 41% produced antifungal metabolites in S medium. Sixty-five per cent of the most frequently isolated strains inhibited the growth of Rhizoctonia solani by the antibiosis assay but only 32% produced metabolites active against R. solani in S medium. Growth promotion and enhanced disease resistance of seedlings inoculated with Streptomyces sp. strain S30 were observed in tomato but not in cucumber seedlings. CONCLUSIONS: Endophytic Streptomyces spp. strains were successfully isolated using stringent methods and strain S30 promoted growth and enhanced resistance to R. solani in tomato seedlings. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Endophytic streptomycetes showing antifungal activity in vitro and in vivo may indicate the potential for their use as biocontrol agents particularly of R. solani disease of tomato seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-one per cent of endophytic streptomycete isolates produced antibacterial metabolites in S medium.

Outcome
antibacterial metabolitese0
Value
Twenty-one per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty-one per cent of endophytic streptomycete isolates produced antibacterial metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty-one per cent of endophytic streptomycete isolates produced antifungal metabolites in S medium.

Outcome
antifungal metabolitese0
Value
41%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“41% produced antifungal metabolites in S medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixty-five per cent of the most frequently isolated strains inhibited Rhizoctonia solani growth by antibiosis assay.

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
growth of Rhizoctonia solanie0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
Sixty-five per cente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sixty-five per cent of the most frequently isolated strains inhibited the growth of Rhizoctonia solani by the antibiosis assay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-two per cent produced metabolites active against R. solani in S medium.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
metabolites active against R. solanie0
Value
32%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 32% produced metabolites active against R. solani in S medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Streptomyces strain S30 promoted tomato seedling growth.

Treatment
inoculated with Streptomyces sp. strain S30e0
Interactor
Streptomyces sp. strain S30Streptomyces sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
Growth promotione0
Direction
promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces sp.
Streptomyces sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth promotion and enhanced disease resistance of seedlings inoculated with Streptomyces sp. strain S30 were observed in tomato but not in cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Streptomyces strain S30 enhanced tomato seedling disease resistance.

Treatment
inoculated with Streptomyces sp. strain S30e0
Interactor
Streptomyces sp. strain S30Streptomyces sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
disease resistancee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces sp.
Streptomyces sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth promotion and enhanced disease resistance of seedlings inoculated with Streptomyces sp. strain S30 were observed in tomato but not in cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–914 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculation effects on growth and disease resistance were absent in cucumber seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Interactor
Streptomyces sp. strain S30Streptomyces sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
Growth promotion and enhanced disease resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces sp.
Streptomyces sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth promotion and enhanced disease resistance of seedlings inoculated with Streptomyces sp. strain S30 were observed in tomato but not in cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–914 · show in text ↑

Streptomyces · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Streptomyces · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

135 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.