Paper · 2014 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Co‐inoculation of Glomus intraradices and Trichoderma atroviride acts as a biostimulant to promote growth, yield and nutrient uptake of vegetable crops

Giuseppe Colla; Youssef Rouphael; Elena Di Mattia; et al.

16
claims
20
verbatim quotes
270
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The application of beneficial microorganisms at transplanting can promote rapid transplant establishment (starter effect) for achieving early and high yields. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biostimulant effects of Glomus intraradices BEG72 (G) and Trichoderma atroviride MUCL 45632 (T) alone or in combination on plant growth parameters, yield, chlorophyll index (SPAD), chlorophyll fluorescence and mineral composition of several vegetable crops. RESULTS: The T. atroviride strain was capable of producing siderophores and auxin-like compounds under a wide range of substrate pH conditions (5.5-8.0). The highest shoot, root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescence in lettuce, tomato and zucchini was observed in the G + T combination, followed by a single inoculation of G or T, whereas the lowest values were recorded in the uninoculated plants. Under greenhouse conditions, the shoot dry weight was significantly increased by 167%, 56%, 115%, 68% and 58% in lettuce, melon, pepper, tomato and zucchini, respectively, when supplied with both beneficial microorganisms in comparison with the control. This increase in root and shoot weight was associated with an increased level of nutrient uptake (e.g. P, Mg, Fe, Zn and B). Under open field conditions, the lettuce shoot and root dry weight increased by 61% and 57%, respectively, with biostimulant microorganism application in field conditions. For zucchini, early and total yields were significantly increased by 59% and 15%, respectively, when plants were inoculated with both microorganisms. CONCLUSION: The application of the biostimulant tablet containing both G and T can promote transplant establishment and vegetable crop productivity in a sustainable way.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma atroviride produced siderophores across substrate pH 5.5-8.0.

Taxon
vegetable cropst0
Interactor
T. atrovirideTrichoderma atroviridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. atroviride strain was capable of producing siderophorese0
Qualifier
(5.5-8.0)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma atroviride
Trichoderma atroviride · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T. atroviride strain was capable of producing siderophores and auxin-like compounds under a wide range of substrate pH conditions (5.5-8.0).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–151 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma atroviride produced auxin-like compounds across substrate pH 5.5-8.0.

Taxon
vegetable cropst0
Interactor
T. atrovirideTrichoderma atroviridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. atroviride strain was capable of producing siderophores and auxin-like compoundse0
Qualifier
(5.5-8.0)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma atroviride
Trichoderma atroviride · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The T. atroviride strain was capable of producing siderophores and auxin-like compounds under a wide range of substrate pH conditions (5.5-8.0).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation gave the highest shoot and root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescence in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
G + T combinatione0
Interactor
Ge0symbiont
Second interactor
Te0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot, root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescencee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest shoot, root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescence in lettuce, tomato and zucchini was observed in the G + T combination, followed by a single inoculation of G or T, whereas the lowest values were recorded in the uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation gave the highest shoot and root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescence in tomato.

Treatment
G + T combinatione0
Interactor
Ge0symbiont
Second interactor
Te0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot, root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescencee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest shoot, root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescence in lettuce, tomato and zucchini was observed in the G + T combination, followed by a single inoculation of G or T, whereas the lowest values were recorded in the uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation gave the highest shoot and root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescence in zucchini.

Treatment
G + T combinatione0
Interactor
Ge0symbiont
Second interactor
Te0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot, root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescencee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest shoot, root dry weight, SPAD and chlorophyll fluorescence in lettuce, tomato and zucchini was observed in the G + T combination, followed by a single inoculation of G or T, whereas the lowest values were recorded in the uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased greenhouse shoot dry weight of lettuce by 167% versus control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
both beneficial microorganismse0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
167%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot dry weight was significantly increased by 167%, 56%, 115%, 68% and 58% in lettuce, melon, pepper, tomato and zucchini, respectively, when supplied with both beneficial microorganisms in comparison with the control.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 907–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased greenhouse shoot dry weight of melon by 56% versus control.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
both beneficial microorganismse0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
56%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot dry weight was significantly increased by 167%, 56%, 115%, 68% and 58% in lettuce, melon, pepper, tomato and zucchini, respectively, when supplied with both beneficial microorganisms in comparison with the control.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 907–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased greenhouse shoot dry weight of pepper by 115% versus control.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
both beneficial microorganismse0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
115%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot dry weight was significantly increased by 167%, 56%, 115%, 68% and 58% in lettuce, melon, pepper, tomato and zucchini, respectively, when supplied with both beneficial microorganisms in comparison with the control.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 907–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased greenhouse shoot dry weight of tomato by 68% versus control.

Treatment
both beneficial microorganismse0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
68%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot dry weight was significantly increased by 167%, 56%, 115%, 68% and 58% in lettuce, melon, pepper, tomato and zucchini, respectively, when supplied with both beneficial microorganisms in comparison with the control.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 907–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased greenhouse shoot dry weight of zucchini by 58% versus control.

Treatment
both beneficial microorganismse0
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
58%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot dry weight was significantly increased by 167%, 56%, 115%, 68% and 58% in lettuce, melon, pepper, tomato and zucchini, respectively, when supplied with both beneficial microorganisms in comparison with the control.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 907–1131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater root and shoot weight was associated with increased nutrient uptake.

Taxon
vegetable cropst0
Organ / stage
root and shoote0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“This increase in root and shoot weight was associated with an increased level of nutrient uptake (e.g. P, Mg, Fe, Zn and B).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce shoot dry weight rose 61% with biostimulant application in the field.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
biostimulant microorganism applicatione0
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
61%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lettuce shoot and root dry weight increased by 61% and 57%, respectively, with biostimulant microorganism application in field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce root dry weight rose 57% with biostimulant application in the field.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
biostimulant microorganism applicatione0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
57%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lettuce shoot and root dry weight increased by 61% and 57%, respectively, with biostimulant microorganism application in field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased zucchini early yield by 59%.

Treatment
inoculated with both microorganismse0
Outcome
earlye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For zucchini, early and total yields were significantly increased by 59% and 15%, respectively, when plants were inoculated with both microorganisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased zucchini total yield by 15%.

Treatment
inoculated with both microorganismse0
Outcome
total yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo
Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For zucchini, early and total yields were significantly increased by 59% and 15%, respectively, when plants were inoculated with both microorganisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1578 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude the combined biostimulant tablet can promote transplant establishment and vegetable productivity.

Taxon
vegetable cropst0
Treatment
biostimulant tablet containing both G and Te0
Outcome
promote transplant establishment and vegetable crop productivitye0

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the biostimulant tablet containing both G and T can promote transplant establishment and vegetable crop productivity in a sustainable way.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1748 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–151 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

other · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 66 positive, 12 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 97 positive, 14 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cucurbita pepoResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cucurbita pepoResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.