Paper · 2010

PERFORMANCE OF GINGER UNDER AGROFORESTRY SYSTEM

M. R. Amin; T. M. T. Ikbal; M. Muinnuddin Miah; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at the Agroforestry Model Farm, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur during May to Dec 2007 to study 11 vital yield traits, yield and quality of a local variety of ginger cultured under three Agroforestry systems, i.e. beneath the shades of three multi-use tree species (2.5 years old) and also in the open field. So, the four treatments were: Open field having no shade vis-a-vis full sunlight (T1 control), under guava trees with 70±5% shade (T2) below black siris trees providing 60±5% shade (T3) and underneath mango trees having 50±5% shade (T4). The trial was set in the Randomized Complete Block Design. Eleven vegetative traits (plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of tillers per plant, leaf size, number of finger per plant, finger fresh weight per plant, finger dry weight per plant, rhizome fresh weight per plant, rhizome dry weight per plant rhizome yield per plot and rhizome yield per hectare) were investigated. Of them, ten were statistically remarkable while only the number of leaves per plant was trivial. The ginger-mango partnership (T4) having 50±5% shade resulted the plant growth of medium status but had the topmost yield of ginger (12.42 t/ha, which was 2.45 fold better than the least yield (5.07 t/ha) of the ginger-guava coalition (T2) and 119.65 times higher even from the from the open field (T1). The yield of ginger (rhizome + finger) was in the sequence mango (119.65) > open field (100.00) > black siris (75.05) > guava (48.84%). Finally, all the coefficients of correlation for 55 partnerships of 11 traits ranged from 0.37 to as high as 0.99. It is interesting to note that all of those values were positively momentous. Nonetheless, only four companionships, e.g. number of rhizomes per plant, rhizome fresh weight per plant, rhizome dry weight per plant and number of fingers per plant with the leaf size were considerable at 5% altitude of possibility. Contritely, the remaining values for 51 coalitions were noteworthy at 99% level of confidence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten of eleven ginger vegetative and yield traits showed statistically remarkable treatment differences.

Treatment
three Agroforestry systemse1
Outcome
tene0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of them, ten were statistically remarkable while only the number of leaves per plant was trivial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“local variety of ginger cultured under three Agroforestry systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number per ginger plant did not show a statistically remarkable difference among systems.

Treatment
three Agroforestry systemse1
Outcome
number of leaves per plante0
Direction
triviale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only the number of leaves per plant was trivial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1094 · show in text ↑
e1

“local variety of ginger cultured under three Agroforestry systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger under mango shade yielded 12.42 t/ha, 2.45 fold the 5.07 t/ha yield under guava shade.

Treatment
ginger-mango partnership (T4)e0
Outcome
yield of gingere0
Direction
bettere0
Value
12.42 t/hae0
Qualifier
2.45 folde0
Comparator
ginger-guava coalition (T2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ginger-mango partnership (T4) having 50±5% shade resulted the plant growth of medium status but had the topmost yield of ginger (12.42 t/ha, which was 2.45 fold better than the least yield (5.07 t/ha) of the ginger-guava coalition (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango shade gave ginger growth of medium status.

Treatment
50±5% shadee0
Outcome
plant growth of medium statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ginger-mango partnership (T4) having 50±5% shade resulted the plant growth of medium status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1191 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger yields followed mango > open field > black siris > guava, with reported relative values 119.65, 100.00, 75.05 and 48.84%.

Outcome
yield of ginger (rhizome + finger)e0
Value
mango (119.65) > open field (100.00) > black siris (75.05) > guava (48.84%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of ginger (rhizome + finger) was in the sequence mango (119.65) > open field (100.00) > black siris (75.05) > guava (48.84%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1535 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All 55 pairwise correlations among 11 ginger traits were positive, ranging from 0.37 to 0.99.

Material
11 traitse0
Outcome
coefficients of correlatione0
Direction
positivelye0
Value
0.37 to as high as 0.99e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“all the coefficients of correlation for 55 partnerships of 11 traits ranged from 0.37 to as high as 0.99. It is interesting to note that all of those values were positively momentous.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1728 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four correlations between leaf size and rhizome number, rhizome fresh weight, rhizome dry weight, or finger number were significant at the 5% level.

Material
number of rhizomes per plant, rhizome fresh weight per plant, rhizome dry weight per plant and number of fingers per plante0
Outcome
leaf sizee0
Value
5%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only four companionships, e.g. number of rhizomes per plant, rhizome fresh weight per plant, rhizome dry weight per plant and number of fingers per plant with the leaf size were considerable at 5% altitude of possibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1962 · show in text ↑
e1

“local variety of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–227 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining 51 ginger trait correlations were reported as noteworthy at 99% confidence.

Material
51 coalitionse0
Outcome
values for 51 coalitionse0
Value
99%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the remaining values for 51 coalitions were noteworthy at 99% level of confidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2057 · show in text ↑
e1

“local variety of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–227 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.