Paper · 2021 · Agronomy Journal

Bamboo‐based agroforestry system effects on soil fertility: Ginger performance in the bamboo subcanopy in the Himalayas (India)

Garima; D. R. Bhardwaj; C. L. Thakur; et al.

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract An on‐farm bamboo intercropping study was conducted near Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India. It uses a split‐plot design with two bamboo species ( Dendrocalamus asper and Dendrocalamus hamiltonii ) and an open field condition as main plots, under which ginger ( Zingiber officinale ) was grown at five nutrient levels supplied through chemical fertilizers and organic sources (subplots). In the intercropping with bamboo species, ginger yield increased by 10.5–15.6% in comparison to the open field condition. Application of farmyard manure (FYM) based on N equivalent ratio showed the best ( P ≤ .05) yield response of ginger (rhizome length, 7.65 cm; yield, 4,028 kg ha −1 ). Photoactive radiation was reduced by 60% under the bamboo canopy. Simultaneously, higher soil moisture (%) content was noticed for D. asper . Various soil physico‐chemical properties (top 0–15 cm) were significantly higher in the FYM treatment under D. asper than under D. hamiltonii or sole ginger cropping. Maximum returns (3,595.67 US$ ha −1 yr −1 ) were realized when the ginger crop was raised under the canopy of D. asper and supplied with FYM on N equivalent ratio + plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria. Overall, the results establish that ginger production in the northwest Himalayan region of India is a viable use of land resources for improved economic returns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger yield increased by 10.5–15.6% when intercropped with bamboo compared with the open field.

Treatment
intercropping with bamboo speciese0
Outcome
ginger yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.5–15.6%e0
Comparator
open field conditione0
Setting
Solan, Himachal Pradesh, Indiae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the intercropping with bamboo species, ginger yield increased by 10.5–15.6% in comparison to the open field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–513 · show in text ↑
e2

“was conducted near Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure on an N equivalent basis gave the best rhizome length of ginger, 7.65 cm.

Treatment
farmyard manure (FYM) based on N equivalent ratioe1
Outcome
rhizome lengthe1
Direction
beste1
Value
7.65 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of farmyard manure (FYM) based on N equivalent ratio showed the best ( P ≤ .05) yield response of ginger (rhizome length, 7.65 cm; yield, 4,028 kg ha −1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 515–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure on an N equivalent basis gave the best ginger yield, 4,028 kg ha −1.

Treatment
farmyard manure (FYM) based on N equivalent ratioe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
beste1
Value
4,028 kg ha −1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of farmyard manure (FYM) based on N equivalent ratio showed the best ( P ≤ .05) yield response of ginger (rhizome length, 7.65 cm; yield, 4,028 kg ha −1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 515–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoactive radiation was reduced by 60% under the bamboo canopy.

Taxon
bambooBambuseaee3
Treatment
bamboo canopye3
Outcome
Photoactive radiatione3
Direction
reducede3
Value
60%e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Photoactive radiation was reduced by 60% under the bamboo canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture content was higher under Dendrocalamus asper.

Outcome
soil moisture (%) contente4
Direction
highere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrocalamus asper
Dendrocalamus asper · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Simultaneously, higher soil moisture (%) content was noticed for D. asper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure under Dendrocalamus asper significantly increased soil physico‐chemical properties compared with D. hamiltonii or sole ginger cropping.

Treatment
FYM treatmente5
Outcome
physico‐chemical propertiese5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
under D. hamiltonii or sole ginger croppinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrocalamus asper
Dendrocalamus asper · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Various soil physico‐chemical properties (top 0–15 cm) were significantly higher in the FYM treatment under D. asper than under D. hamiltonii or sole ginger cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum ginger returns were obtained under the D. asper canopy with FYM and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, at 3,595.67 US$ ha −1 yr −1.

Treatment
FYM on N equivalent ratio + plant growth–promoting rhizobacteriae6
Outcome
returnse6
Direction
Maximume6
Value
3,595.67 US$ ha −1 yr −1e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Maximum returns (3,595.67 US$ ha −1 yr −1) were realized when the ginger crop was raised under the canopy of D. asper and supplied with FYM on N equivalent ratio + plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 992–1193 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that ginger production in the northwest Himalayan region of India is a viable use of land resources.

Outcome
a viable use of land resourcese7
Setting
northwest Himalayan region of Indiae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Overall, the results establish that ginger production in the northwest Himalayan region of India is a viable use of land resources for improved economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1355 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.