Paper · 1993 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Growth and yield responses of ginger (Zingiber officinaleRoscoe) as affected by shade and fertilizer applications

Hugh Wilson; Althea Ovid

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted on a Vertisol to study the effect of shade and fertilizer applications in reducing lime‐induced iron chlorosis, thereby improving crop growth and yield of ginger. Plant height and tiller number were increased with shade treatment, while the severity of iron chlorosis was reduced. Ginger growth under 66% saran netting, inter‐cropped with ochro and inter‐cropped with corn and peas, significantly outyielded those plants intercropped with corn only and those with no shade. Fertilizer applications did not have any significant effect on yield in comparison to shade treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade increased ginger height and tiller number.

Treatment
shade treatmente0
Outcome
Plant height and tiller numbere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and tiller number were increased with shade treatment, while the severity of iron chlorosis was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–322 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinaleRoscoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade reduced iron chlorosis severity.

Treatment
shade treatmente0
Outcome
severity of iron chlorosise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and tiller number were increased with shade treatment, while the severity of iron chlorosis was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–322 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinaleRoscoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger under 66% netting significantly outyielded corn only and no shade.

Treatment
66% saran nettinge0
Outcome
outyieldede0
Direction
outyieldede0
Comparator
intercropped with corn onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ginger growth under 66% saran netting, inter‐cropped with ochro and inter‐cropped with corn and peas, significantly outyielded those plants intercropped with corn only and those with no shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinaleRoscoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger intercropped with ochro significantly outyielded corn only and no shade.

Treatment
inter‐cropped with ochroe0
Outcome
outyieldede0
Direction
outyieldede0
Comparator
intercropped with corn onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ginger growth under 66% saran netting, inter‐cropped with ochro and inter‐cropped with corn and peas, significantly outyielded those plants intercropped with corn only and those with no shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinaleRoscoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ginger intercropped with corn and peas significantly outyielded corn only and no shade.

Treatment
inter‐cropped with corn and pease0
Outcome
outyieldede0
Direction
outyieldede0
Comparator
intercropped with corn onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ginger growth under 66% saran netting, inter‐cropped with ochro and inter‐cropped with corn and peas, significantly outyielded those plants intercropped with corn only and those with no shade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinaleRoscoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer applications did not significantly affect yield relative to shade treatments.

Treatment
Fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Comparator
shade treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer applications did not have any significant effect on yield in comparison to shade treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinaleRoscoe)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–64 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

shade · physiology: pigments · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.