Paper · 2019 · Agriculture & Food Security

Yield loss of ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) in different wilt management systems in Ethiopia

Merga Jibat Guji; Habtamu Terefe Yetayew; Eshetu Derso Kidanu

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ginger bacterial wilt is the most destructive disease that causes qualitative and quantitative rhizome yield losses in Ethiopia. Field studies were conducted to assess yield loss caused by bacterial wilt of ginger in different wilt management systems at Teppi and Jimma, Ethiopia, during 2017. Management systems were host resistance (Boziab and Local) and cultural practices (lemon grass, potassium fertilizer and soil solarization), which were applied as sole and in different levels of integrations. The experiments were factorial arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Disease, growth, yield and yield-related data were collected from central rows of each experimental plot. Data were subjected to analysis of variance using linear general model (GLM) procedure of SAS version 9.3. Mean separation was made using least significant difference test. Correlation among parameters and linear regression of rhizome yield versus final wilt incidence were computed using Minitab 14 statistical package. Analysis of variance indicated that variety, cultural practices and variety × cultural practice interaction effects significantly reduced wilt incidence and increased rhizome yield and its components. Variety Boziab recorded relatively more yield and yield components than the Local variety. Rhizome yield gains of about 51.4% in Local and 51.9% in Boziab at Teppi and 39.4% in Local and 49.1% in Boziab at Jimma were obtained due to integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilization. The mean relative yield loss calculated for control plots due to bacterial wilt ranged from 51.4 to 51.9% at Teppi and 39.4 to 49.1% at Jimma. The lowest relative yield loss was computed from plots treated with either lemon grass with soil fertilization and solarization or lemon grass with soil fertilization. Final wilt incidence was inversely and highly significantly (P ≤ 0.001) correlated (r = − 0.90** and − 0.88**) with rhizome yield of Boziab and Local, respectively, at Teppi. The slope of the regression line also estimated that for each unit increase in percent of final mean wilt incidence, there was a rhizome yield reduction of 0.18 t ha−1 for Boziab and 0.19 t ha−1 for Local variety at Teppi. Similar trends were observed at Jimma. Moreover, the most integrated treatment provided higher net benefit with optimum marginal rate of return than others. The overall results indicated that integration of host resistance with cultural practices reduces yield loss, improves ginger productivity and significantly reduces bacterial wilt epidemics, and thus, it is recommended in the study areas and other related agroecologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety, cultural practices and their interaction significantly reduced wilt incidence.

Treatment
cultural practicese0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
wilt incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety, cultural practices and variety × cultural practice interaction effects significantly reduced wilt incidence and increased rhizome yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety, cultural practices and their interaction significantly increased rhizome yield and components.

Treatment
cultural practicese0
Outcome
rhizome yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety, cultural practices and variety × cultural practice interaction effects significantly reduced wilt incidence and increased rhizome yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boziab had more yield and yield components than Local.

Material
Boziabe0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Local varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variety Boziab recorded relatively more yield and yield components than the Local variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management gave 51.4% rhizome yield gain for Local at Teppi.

Material
Locale0
Treatment
integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilizatione0
Outcome
Rhizome yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Value
51.4%e0
Setting
Teppie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizome yield gains of about 51.4% in Local and 51.9% in Boziab at Teppi and 39.4% in Local and 49.1% in Boziab at Jimma were obtained due to integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management gave 51.9% rhizome yield gain for Boziab at Teppi.

Material
Boziabe0
Treatment
integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilizatione0
Outcome
Rhizome yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Value
51.9%e0
Setting
Teppie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizome yield gains of about 51.4% in Local and 51.9% in Boziab at Teppi and 39.4% in Local and 49.1% in Boziab at Jimma were obtained due to integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management gave 39.4% rhizome yield gain for Local at Jimma.

Material
Locale0
Treatment
integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilizatione0
Outcome
Rhizome yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Value
39.4%e0
Setting
Jimmae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizome yield gains of about 51.4% in Local and 51.9% in Boziab at Teppi and 39.4% in Local and 49.1% in Boziab at Jimma were obtained due to integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management gave 49.1% rhizome yield gain for Boziab at Jimma.

Material
Boziabe0
Treatment
integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilizatione0
Outcome
Rhizome yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Value
49.1%e0
Setting
Jimmae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizome yield gains of about 51.4% in Local and 51.9% in Boziab at Teppi and 39.4% in Local and 49.1% in Boziab at Jimma were obtained due to integrated application of lemon grass with soil solarization and soil fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots had 51.4 to 51.9% relative yield loss at Teppi due to wilt.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
relative yield losse0
Value
51.4 to 51.9%e0
Setting
Teppie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean relative yield loss calculated for control plots due to bacterial wilt ranged from 51.4 to 51.9% at Teppi and 39.4 to 49.1% at Jimma.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots had 39.4 to 49.1% relative yield loss at Jimma due to wilt.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
relative yield losse0
Value
39.4 to 49.1%e0
Setting
Jimmae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean relative yield loss calculated for control plots due to bacterial wilt ranged from 51.4 to 51.9% at Teppi and 39.4 to 49.1% at Jimma.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two lemon grass combinations produced the lowest relative yield loss.

Treatment
lemon grass with soil fertilizatione0
Outcome
relative yield losse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest relative yield loss was computed from plots treated with either lemon grass with soil fertilization and solarization or lemon grass with soil fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1862 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Final wilt incidence was inversely correlated with rhizome yield of Boziab at Teppi (− 0.90**).

Material
Boziabe0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
rhizome yielde0
Direction
inverselye0
Value
− 0.90**e0
Setting
Teppie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final wilt incidence was inversely and highly significantly (P ≤ 0.001) correlated (r = − 0.90** and − 0.88**) with rhizome yield of Boziab and Local, respectively, at Teppi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2037 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Final wilt incidence was inversely correlated with rhizome yield of Local at Teppi (− 0.88**).

Material
Locale0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
rhizome yielde0
Direction
inverselye0
Value
− 0.88**e0
Setting
Teppie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Final wilt incidence was inversely and highly significantly (P ≤ 0.001) correlated (r = − 0.90** and − 0.88**) with rhizome yield of Boziab and Local, respectively, at Teppi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1863–2037 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each unit increase in final wilt incidence corresponded to 0.18 t ha−1 rhizome yield reduction in Boziab at Teppi.

Material
Boziabe0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
rhizome yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
0.18 t ha−1e0
Setting
Teppie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for each unit increase in percent of final mean wilt incidence, there was a rhizome yield reduction of 0.18 t ha−1 for Boziab and 0.19 t ha−1 for Local variety at Teppi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2091–2260 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each unit increase in final wilt incidence corresponded to 0.19 t ha−1 rhizome yield reduction in Local at Teppi.

Material
Locale0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
rhizome yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
0.19 t ha−1e0
Setting
Teppie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for each unit increase in percent of final mean wilt incidence, there was a rhizome yield reduction of 0.18 t ha−1 for Boziab and 0.19 t ha−1 for Local variety at Teppi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2091–2260 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar wilt and yield trends were observed at Jimma.

Outcome
Similar trendse0
Setting
Jimmae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trends were observed at Jimma.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2261–2299 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale) due to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most integrated treatment gave higher net benefit and optimum marginal rate of return.

Treatment
the most integrated treatmente0
Outcome
net benefit with optimum marginal rate of returne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most integrated treatment provided higher net benefit with optimum marginal rate of return than others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2310–2417 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating host resistance with cultural practices in the study areas and related agroecologies.

Outcome
integration of host resistance with cultural practicese0
Setting
the study areas and other related agroecologiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of host resistance with cultural practices reduces yield loss, improves ginger productivity and significantly reduces bacterial wilt epidemics, and thus, it is recommended in the study areas and other related agroecologies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2453–2688 · show in text ↑
t0

“ginger (Zingiber officinale)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–42 · show in text ↑

Cymbopogon citratus · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

solarization · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.