Paper · 2021 · Plant Science Today

Plant growth promoting bacteria Bacillus subtilis promote growth and physiological parameters of Zingiber officinale Roscoe

D Jabborova; Y Enakiev; Khurshid Sulaymanov; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
51
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) is an important medicinal crop grown for its aromatic rhizome which is used as a spice, food, flavouring agent and medicine. It has been characterised for its hypoglycemic, hypotensive, antioxidant and antibiotic properties. This study was conducted to determine the impact of plant growth-promoting potential of bacterial strain Bacillus subtilis L2 on plant growth and physiological properties of ginger. The experiment was carried out in randomised block design with three replications in pot experiments. The plants were grown in greenhouse conditions for three months. The results showed that at 8 and 12 weeks after planting (WAP) bacterial inoculation increased plant height, leaf length, number of leaves per plant and leaf width. Inoculation with B. subtilis L2 significantly increased plant height by 16, 20 and 18% compared to control at 4, 8 and 12 WAP. At 8 and 12 WAP, leaf length significantly raised by B. subtilis L2 as compared to uninoculated control. B. subtilis L2 significantly increased the number of leaves per plant and leaf width by 30 and 21% respectively when comparing with non-inoculated plants at 8 WAP. The percentage increase in chlorophyll content resulted from the inoculation with B. subtilis L2 over the control was 10.5%, 15.5% and 18.4% at 4, 8 and 12 WAP respectively. It is concluded that there is a significant positive effect of inoculation with B. subtilis L2 on the growth of ginger. B. subtilis L2 strain can be used as a potential agent or bio-fertiliser for stimulation of ginger growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased ginger height, leaf length, leaf number and leaf width at 8 and 12 weeks after planting.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
plant height, leaf length, number of leaves per plant and leaf widthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at 8 and 12 weeks after planting (WAP)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 8 and 12 weeks after planting (WAP) bacterial inoculation increased plant height, leaf length, number of leaves per plant and leaf width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and physiological properties of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis L2 increased ginger plant height by 16%, 20% and 18% at 4, 8 and 12 WAP, respectively, versus control.

Treatment
Inoculation with B. subtilis L2e0
Interactor
B. subtilis L2Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16, 20 and 18%e0
Qualifier
at 4, 8 and 12 WAPe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with B. subtilis L2 significantly increased plant height by 16, 20 and 18% compared to control at 4, 8 and 12 WAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–900 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis L2 significantly increased ginger leaf length at 8 and 12 WAP compared with uninoculated control.

Treatment
B. subtilis L2e0
Interactor
B. subtilis L2Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
At 8 and 12 WAPe0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 and 12 WAP, leaf length significantly raised by B. subtilis L2 as compared to uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis L2 increased ginger leaves per plant by 30% at 8 WAP compared with non-inoculated plants.

Treatment
B. subtilis L2e0
Interactor
B. subtilis L2Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
number of leaves per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30e0
Qualifier
at 8 WAPe0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis L2 significantly increased the number of leaves per plant and leaf width by 30 and 21% respectively when comparing with non-inoculated plants at 8 WAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis L2 increased ginger leaf width by 21% at 8 WAP compared with non-inoculated plants.

Treatment
B. subtilis L2e0
Interactor
B. subtilis L2Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
leaf widthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
at 8 WAPe0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis L2 significantly increased the number of leaves per plant and leaf width by 30 and 21% respectively when comparing with non-inoculated plants at 8 WAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis L2 inoculation increased ginger chlorophyll content by 10.5%, 15.5% and 18.4% at 4, 8 and 12 WAP relative to control.

Treatment
inoculation with B. subtilis L2e0
Interactor
B. subtilis L2Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10.5%, 15.5% and 18.4%e0
Qualifier
at 4, 8 and 12 WAP respectivelye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage increase in chlorophyll content resulted from the inoculation with B. subtilis L2 over the control was 10.5%, 15.5% and 18.4% at 4, 8 and 12 WAP respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of ginger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1463 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest B. subtilis L2 as a bio-fertiliser to stimulate ginger growth.

Interactor
B. subtilis L2Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
stimulation of ginger growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zingiber officinale
Zingiber officinale · TaxonGreg III Espera · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis L2 strain can be used as a potential agent or bio-fertiliser for stimulation of ginger growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1570 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.