Paper · 2014 · International Research Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science

International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science

Olivia Odiyo

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
116
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Haploid breeding via in vivo induction of maternal haploids is rapidly replacing the pedigree breeding methods since it reduces the breeding cycle from at least 6 to 1-2 generations to reach a homozygous state. Eighty doubled haploid (DH) lines derived from nine tropical maize backcross populations were crossed to two CIMMYT single cross testers (CML312/CML442 and CML395/CML444) in a North Carolina II mating design. The resultant 160 DH testcross hybrids and five commercial checks were evaluated across four well-watered locations and two drought stressed locations in Kenya using an alpha-lattice design of 15 x 11 replicated twice. Significant differences (0.05 < p < 0.001) were observed in location, genotype and genotype by environment interaction for grain yield, days to anthesis, anthesis-silking interval and ear aspect under nonstress conditions. Combined analyses across drought stress and well-watered environments showed that the top 20 hybrids performed better for grain yield and other agronomic traits of maize compared to the commercial checks. Grain yield for the top 20 DH hybrids ranged from 8.15-8.85 t/ha under optimum management and 4.53-5.67 t/ha under drought stress conditions while the best commercial variety yielded 7.67 t/ha and 3.43 t/ha under optimum and drought stress conditions, respectively. The top ten DH testcross hybrids averaged over the four optimum locations yielded 16% higher than the best commercial check while under managed drought the top ten DH hybrids produced 62% higher grain yield than the best commercial check. Three DH testcross hybrids entries 23, 28 and 71 performed highly for grain yield under both stress and non-stress locations high stress tolerance indices (STI) and low stress susceptibility indices (SSI). These results indicated that maize hybrids developed from DH lines produced as high a grain yield and as acceptable agronomic traits as the commercial hybrids developed through conventional pedigree methods. The DH lines identified in the study should be useful in improving grain yields and in the drought prone mid-altitude areas of eastern and southern Africa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Location, genotype and genotype by environment interaction differed significantly for grain yield, days to anthesis, anthesis-silking interval and ear aspect under nonstress conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
grain yield, days to anthesis, anthesis-silking interval and ear aspecte0
Setting
nonstress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences (0.05 < p < 0.001) were observed in location, genotype and genotype by environment interaction for grain yield, days to anthesis, anthesis-silking interval and ear aspect under nonstress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–860 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The top 20 maize hybrids performed better for grain yield and other agronomic traits than commercial checks across drought and well-watered environments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
top 20 hybridse0
Treatment
drought stress and well-watered environmentse0
Outcome
grain yield and other agronomic traitse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
commercial checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined analyses across drought stress and well-watered environments showed that the top 20 hybrids performed better for grain yield and other agronomic traits of maize compared to the commercial checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top 20 DH maize hybrids yielded 8.15-8.85 t/ha under optimum management.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
top 20 DH hybridse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
rangede0
Value
8.15-8.85 t/hae0
Setting
under optimum managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield for the top 20 DH hybrids ranged from 8.15-8.85 t/ha under optimum management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top 20 DH maize hybrids yielded 4.53-5.67 t/ha under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
top 20 DH hybridse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
rangede0
Value
4.53-5.67 t/hae0
Setting
under drought stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield for the top 20 DH hybrids ranged from 8.15-8.85 t/ha under optimum management and 4.53-5.67 t/ha under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1207 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best commercial maize variety yielded 7.67 t/ha under optimum conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
the best commercial varietye0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
7.67 t/hae0
Setting
optimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best commercial variety yielded 7.67 t/ha and 3.43 t/ha under optimum and drought stress conditions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best commercial maize variety yielded 3.43 t/ha under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
the best commercial varietye0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
3.43 t/hae0
Setting
drought stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best commercial variety yielded 7.67 t/ha and 3.43 t/ha under optimum and drought stress conditions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top ten DH maize testcross hybrids yielded 16% more than the best commercial check across four optimum locations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
top ten DH testcross hybridse0
Treatment
four optimum locationse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
highere0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
best commercial checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The top ten DH testcross hybrids averaged over the four optimum locations yielded 16% higher than the best commercial check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1456 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top ten DH maize hybrids produced 62% higher grain yield than the best commercial check under managed drought.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
top ten DH hybridse0
Treatment
managed droughte0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
62%e0
Comparator
best commercial checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under managed drought the top ten DH hybrids produced 62% higher grain yield than the best commercial check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1570 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DH maize testcross entries 23, 28 and 71 had high grain yield under both stress and non-stress conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
entries 23, 28 and 71e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highlye0
Setting
both stress and non-stress locationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three DH testcross hybrids entries 23, 28 and 71 performed highly for grain yield under both stress and non-stress locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DH maize testcross entries 23, 28 and 71 had high stress tolerance indices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
entries 23, 28 and 71e0
Outcome
stress tolerance indices (STI)e0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three DH testcross hybrids entries 23, 28 and 71 performed highly for grain yield under both stress and non-stress locations high stress tolerance indices (STI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DH maize testcross entries 23, 28 and 71 had low stress susceptibility indices.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
entries 23, 28 and 71e0
Outcome
stress susceptibility indices (SSI)e0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three DH testcross hybrids entries 23, 28 and 71 performed highly for grain yield under both stress and non-stress locations high stress tolerance indices (STI) and low stress susceptibility indices (SSI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1776 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The identified DH maize lines are proposed for improving grain yields in drought-prone mid-altitude areas of eastern and southern Africa.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Material
DH linese0
Outcome
improving grain yieldse0
Setting
eastern and southern Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DH lines identified in the study should be useful in improving grain yields and in the drought prone mid-altitude areas of eastern and southern Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1986–2140 · show in text ↑
e1

“agronomic traits of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1031 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 102 positive, 78 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

drought · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

353 papers: 53 positive, 300 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 300 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

349 papers more in this group

See all 353 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.