Paper · 2003 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Influence of VAM fungi on cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) infested with reniform nematode

N. Seenivasan; Rajeswari Sundarababu; K. Devrajan; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi viz., Glomus mosseae, G. fasciculatum, G. intraradices and G. fulvum were screened to select efficient VAM fungi for management of Rotylenchulus reniformis in cotton (Gossypium barbadense) cv. TCB 209. Plants inoculated with G. fasciculatum were significantly better in all respects of plant growth, mycorrhizal colonization and yield of cotton. G. fasciculatum and G. mosseae were equally effective in reducing R. reniformis population in root and soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G. fasciculatum inoculation significantly improved cotton growth.

Material
TCB 209e1
Treatment
inoculated with G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with G. fasciculatum were significantly better in all respects of plant growth, mycorrhizal colonization and yield of cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–395 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rotylenchulus reniformis in cotton (Gossypium barbadense) cv. TCB 209”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G. fasciculatum inoculation significantly improved mycorrhizal colonization.

Treatment
inoculated with G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with G. fasciculatum were significantly better in all respects of plant growth, mycorrhizal colonization and yield of cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G. fasciculatum inoculation significantly improved cotton yield.

Treatment
inoculated with G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
yield of cottone0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with G. fasciculatum were significantly better in all respects of plant growth, mycorrhizal colonization and yield of cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. fasciculatum reduced R. reniformis populations in cotton root and soil.

Treatment
G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise0pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
R. reniformis population in root and soile0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. fasciculatum and G. mosseae were equally effective in reducing R. reniformis population in root and soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cotton (Gossypium barbadense) cv. TCB 209”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. mosseae reduced R. reniformis populations in cotton root and soil as effectively as G. fasciculatum.

Treatment
G. mosseaee0
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise0pathogen
Second interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
R. reniformis population in root and soile0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
G. fasciculatume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. fasciculatum and G. mosseae were equally effective in reducing R. reniformis population in root and soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cotton (Gossypium barbadense) cv. TCB 209”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–250 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 18 positive, 24 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 46 positive, 4 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 61 positive, 12 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.