Paper · 1988 · Nematologica

Effect of Quintozen, Benomyl and Carbendazim On the Interaction Between the Endomycorrhizal Fungus Glomus Fasciculatum and the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidugyne Incognita On Cotton

H.M. Saleh; R.A. Sikora

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of Quintozen, Benomyl, and Carbendazim, applied as a drench, on the VA endomycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum, the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita and on the interaction between the two was studied on cotton in the greenhouse. G. fasciculatum did not affect plant growth or nematode population density 30 days after simultaneous inoculation at planting, but caused significant increases in plant growth and a significant reduction in M. incognita population density and reproduction 50 days after inoculation. The fungicides did not alter nematode populations on nonmycorrhizal plants. Benomyl and Carbendazim, however, significantly reduced G. fasciculatum antagonistic activity toward M. incognita reproduction when applied at planting. The diminution of antagonism was stronger than the effect of the fungicides on symbiont root colonization of cotton. Carbendazim, which was less toxic to G. fasciculatum than Benomyl, did not influence mycorrhizal intensity when applied at planting or 25 days later. Nematode numbers increased significantly on mycorrhizal plants when Benomyl was applied at planting, but no significant change was noticed with similar applications of Carbendazim. Conversely, there were fewer nematodes in mycorrhizal plants when the fungicides were applied 25 days after planting. The results demonstrated that fungicide concentration and time of application are important factors influencing the antagonistic interaction between endomycorrhizal fungi and root-knot nematodes on cotton. Effective use of VA mycorrhizae in nematode control systems, therefore, will require proper screening of fungicides for fungicidal activity to endomycorrhizal fungi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cotton, G. fasciculatum did not affect plant growth or nematode population density 30 days after simultaneous inoculation at planting.

Treatment
simultaneous inoculation at plantinge1
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbiont
Outcome
plant growth or nematode population densitye1
Direction
did not affecte1
Qualifier
30 dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. fasciculatum did not affect plant growth or nematode population density 30 days after simultaneous inoculation at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–376 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In cotton, G. fasciculatum caused a significant increase in plant growth 50 days after inoculation.

Treatment
G. fasciculatume1
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe2
Direction
increasese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. fasciculatum did not affect plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
e2

“caused significant increases in plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In cotton, G. fasciculatum caused a significant reduction in M. incognita population density and reproduction 50 days after inoculation.

Treatment
G. fasciculatume1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbiont
Outcome
M. incognita population density and reproductione2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. fasciculatum did not affect plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
e2

“a significant reduction in M. incognita population density and reproduction 50 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicides did not alter nematode populations on nonmycorrhizal cotton plants.

Treatment
fungicidese1
Interactor
nematodeNematodae1pathogen
Outcome
nematode populationse1
Direction
did not altere1
Qualifier
nonmycorrhizal plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fungicides did not alter nematode populations on nonmycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl applied at planting significantly reduced the antagonistic activity of G. fasciculatum toward M. incognita reproduction on cotton.

Treatment
Benomyle1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbiont
Outcome
G. fasciculatum antagonistic activity toward M. incognita reproductione1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
when applied at plantinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Benomyl and Carbendazim, however, significantly reduced G. fasciculatum antagonistic activity toward M. incognita reproduction when applied at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim applied at planting significantly reduced the antagonistic activity of G. fasciculatum toward M. incognita reproduction on cotton.

Treatment
Carbendazime1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbiont
Outcome
G. fasciculatum antagonistic activity toward M. incognita reproductione1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
when applied at plantinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Benomyl and Carbendazim, however, significantly reduced G. fasciculatum antagonistic activity toward M. incognita reproduction when applied at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The diminution of G. fasciculatum antagonism caused by the fungicides was stronger than the effect of the fungicides on symbiont root colonization of cotton.

Treatment
fungicidese1
Outcome
diminution of antagonisme1
Direction
strongere1
Comparator
effect of the fungicides on symbiont root colonizatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The diminution of antagonism was stronger than the effect of the fungicides on symbiont root colonization of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim did not influence mycorrhizal intensity of G. fasciculatum on cotton when applied at planting or 25 days later.

Treatment
Carbendazime1
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal intensitye1
Direction
did not influencee1
Qualifier
when applied at planting or 25 days latere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carbendazim, which was less toxic to G. fasciculatum than Benomyl, did not influence mycorrhizal intensity when applied at planting or 25 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim was less toxic to G. fasciculatum than Benomyl.

Treatment
Carbendazime1
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbiont
Outcome
toxic to G. fasciculatume1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
Benomyle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carbendazim, which was less toxic to G. fasciculatum than Benomyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode numbers increased significantly on mycorrhizal cotton plants when Benomyl was applied at planting.

Treatment
Benomyle1
Interactor
NematodeNematodae1pathogen
Outcome
Nematode numberse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
mycorrhizal plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nematode numbers increased significantly on mycorrhizal plants when Benomyl was applied at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode numbers on mycorrhizal cotton plants showed no significant change with Carbendazim applied at planting.

Treatment
Carbendazime1
Interactor
NematodeNematodae1pathogen
Outcome
Nematode numberse1
Direction
no significant changee1
Qualifier
mycorrhizal plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nematode numbers increased significantly on mycorrhizal plants when Benomyl was applied at planting, but no significant change was noticed with similar applications of Carbendazim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There were fewer nematodes in mycorrhizal cotton plants when the fungicides were applied 25 days after planting.

Treatment
the fungicides were applied 25 days after plantinge1
Interactor
nematodesNematodae1pathogen
Outcome
nematodese1
Direction
fewere1
Qualifier
mycorrhizal plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“there were fewer nematodes in mycorrhizal plants when the fungicides were applied 25 days after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1327 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide concentration and time of application are important factors influencing the antagonistic interaction between endomycorrhizal fungi and root-knot nematodes on cotton.

Treatment
fungicide concentration and time of applicatione1
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynee1pathogen
Second interactor
endomycorrhizal fungie1symbiont
Outcome
antagonistic interaction between endomycorrhizal fungi and root-knot nematodese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“fungicide concentration and time of application are important factors influencing the antagonistic interaction between endomycorrhizal fungi and root-knot nematodes on cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1533 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Effective use of VA mycorrhizae in nematode control on cotton will require proper screening of fungicides for fungicidal activity to endomycorrhizal fungi.

Outcome
proper screening of fungicides for fungicidal activity to endomycorrhizal fungie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 171–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effective use of VA mycorrhizae in nematode control systems, therefore, will require proper screening of fungicides for fungicidal activity to endomycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1699 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.