Abstract
Experiments on evaluation of Pigeonpea Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Module in comparison with the farmers’ practice were conducted with the variety Vamban 1 for three years from 2000-2002. Adoption of IPM module consisting of the components viz., early sowing (June 3rd week), setting up of pheromone traps against Helicoverpa armigera @ 12/ha, installing bird perches @ 50/ha using “T” shaped poles, mechanical collection and disposal of pod borer larvae and infested parts, use of bio-rational pesticides viz., Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE) 5% at 50% flowering, spraying of HaNPV @ 500LE/ha at early pod set and need based spraying of insecticides viz., dichlorvos 0.08% against flower webber, Maruca vitrata Geyer at flowering and chlorpyriphos 0.05% at podding against pod borer complex registered reduced pod borer (14.6-26.6%), pod wasp (1.8-3.0%) and pod fly (2.4-4.0%) damage as against the farmers’ practice viz., late sowing (July 3rd week), dusting with lindane 1.3 D @ 25 kg/ha at flowering and podding, which registered higher pod borer (24.3-38.6%), pod wasp (3.5-7.0%) and pod fly (6.00%) damage. The grain yield (362-530 kg/ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.73-1.91) were also higher in IPM plots compared to farmers’ practice (239 -410 kg/ha and 1.24-1.38 respectively).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The pigeonpea IPM module reduced pod borer damage (14.6-26.6%) relative to farmers practice (24.3-38.6%).
- Taxon
- Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Material
- Vamban 1e0
- Treatment
- IPM modulee1
- Interactor
- pod borere3pest
- Outcome
- pod borere3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 14.6-26.6%e3
- Qualifier
- 24.3-38.6%e4
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee2
- Setting
- rainfed ecosystemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Evaluation of pigeonpea integrated pest management module in rainfed ecosystem”
e0“Experiments on evaluation of Pigeonpea Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Module in comparison with the farmers’ practice were conducted with the variety Vamban 1”
e1“Adoption of IPM module consisting of the components viz., early sowing (June 3rd week)”
e2“as against the farmers’ practice viz.”
e3“registered reduced pod borer (14.6-26.6%), pod wasp (1.8-3.0%) and pod fly (2.4-4.0%) damage”
e4“which registered higher pod borer (24.3-38.6%), pod wasp (3.5-7.0%) and pod fly (6.00%) damage”
Claim · model-written summary
The pigeonpea IPM module reduced pod wasp damage (1.8-3.0%) relative to farmers practice (3.5-7.0%).
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- Vamban 1e0
- Treatment
- IPM modulee1
- Interactor
- pod waspe3pest
- Outcome
- pod waspe3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 1.8-3.0%e3
- Qualifier
- 3.5-7.0%e4
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee2
- Setting
- rainfed ecosystemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Evaluation of pigeonpea integrated pest management module in rainfed ecosystem”
e0“Experiments on evaluation of Pigeonpea Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Module in comparison with the farmers’ practice were conducted with the variety Vamban 1”
e1“Adoption of IPM module consisting of the components viz., early sowing (June 3rd week)”
e2“as against the farmers’ practice viz.”
e3“registered reduced pod borer (14.6-26.6%), pod wasp (1.8-3.0%) and pod fly (2.4-4.0%) damage”
e4“which registered higher pod borer (24.3-38.6%), pod wasp (3.5-7.0%) and pod fly (6.00%) damage”
Claim · model-written summary
The pigeonpea IPM module reduced pod fly damage (2.4-4.0%) relative to farmers practice (6.00%).
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- Vamban 1e0
- Treatment
- IPM modulee1
- Interactor
- pod flye3pest
- Outcome
- pod flye3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Value
- 2.4-4.0%e3
- Qualifier
- 6.00%e4
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee2
- Setting
- rainfed ecosystemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Evaluation of pigeonpea integrated pest management module in rainfed ecosystem”
e0“Experiments on evaluation of Pigeonpea Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Module in comparison with the farmers’ practice were conducted with the variety Vamban 1”
e1“Adoption of IPM module consisting of the components viz., early sowing (June 3rd week)”
e2“as against the farmers’ practice viz.”
e3“registered reduced pod borer (14.6-26.6%), pod wasp (1.8-3.0%) and pod fly (2.4-4.0%) damage”
e4“which registered higher pod borer (24.3-38.6%), pod wasp (3.5-7.0%) and pod fly (6.00%) damage”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was higher in IPM plots (362-530 kg/ha) than in farmers practice (239-410 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- IPM plotse5
- Outcome
- grain yielde5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 362-530 kg/hae5
- Qualifier
- 239 -410 kg/hae5
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee5
- Setting
- rainfed ecosystemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Evaluation of pigeonpea integrated pest management module in rainfed ecosystem”
e0“Experiments on evaluation of Pigeonpea Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Module in comparison with the farmers’ practice were conducted with the variety Vamban 1”
e5“The grain yield (362-530 kg/ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.73-1.91) were also higher in IPM plots compared to farmers’ practice (239 -410 kg/ha and 1.24-1.38 respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio was higher in IPM plots (1.73-1.91) than in farmers practice (1.24-1.38).
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- IPM plotse5
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 1.73-1.91e5
- Qualifier
- 1.24-1.38e5
- Comparator
- farmers’ practicee5
- Setting
- rainfed ecosystemt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Evaluation of pigeonpea integrated pest management module in rainfed ecosystem”
e0“Experiments on evaluation of Pigeonpea Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Module in comparison with the farmers’ practice were conducted with the variety Vamban 1”
e5“The grain yield (362-530 kg/ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.73-1.91) were also higher in IPM plots compared to farmers’ practice (239 -410 kg/ha and 1.24-1.38 respectively)”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.