Intervention effectmodel-written summary

INM+IWM+IPM yielded higher than INM+IWM in pigeonpea, but the two were statistically at par.

A claim from Studies on integrated Agro-Techniques approaches for yield maximization of pigeonpea [Cajanus Cajan (L.) Millsp.] in Mid-Hills of Tripura, India · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

INM+IWM+IPM yielded higher than INM+IWM in pigeonpea, but the two were statistically at par.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
INM+IWM+IPMe4
Outcome
yieldede4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
INM+IWMe4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present investigation was conducted to see the effect of integrated agro-techniques on growth and growth attributes of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–284
e4

“INM+IWM+IPM yielded higher followed by INM+IWM however each of them was statistically at par throughout the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–860

Title

Studies on integrated Agro-Techniques approaches for yield maximization of pigeonpea [Cajanus Cajan (L.) Millsp.] in Mid-Hills of Tripura, India

Biman De; Subrata Ray; Partha Das; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2018. doi:10.18805/lr-3864

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e683f63ef9f472bdef444cc0abf3ac63e5b426b098f398a95cb3f5035b613abf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

ipm · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Grain yield was higher in IPM plots (362-530 kg/ha) than in farmers practice (239-410 kg/ha).

    Evaluation of pigeonpea integrated pest management module in rainfed ecosystem · 2006 · compared with farmers’ practice

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
    CA-based ICM modules had higher pigeonpea productivity than conventional and organic modules.

    Integrated crop management practices for enhancing productivity, profitability, production-efficiency and monetary-efficiency of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in Indo-Gangetic plains region · 2019 · compared with other conventional agriculture and organic agriculture-based ICM modules

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    IPM adoption increased net returns.

    Adoption, Impact and Discontinuance of Integrated Pest Management Technologies for Pigeon Pea in South India · 2011

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
    Grain yield and C/B ratio were higher in the IPM demonstrated fields than in farmers practice.

    Evaluation and Demonstration of Pigeonpea IPM Module for Pod Borer Management · 2009 · compared with farmers’ practice

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    IPM plots gave a higher pooled grain yield, 1286.5 kg/ha, than non-IPM plots, 888 kg/ha.

    Validation of integrated pest management module against insect pests of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan in Tarai region of Uttarakhand · 2017 · compared with non-IPM plots

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    IPM fields had higher pigeonpea yield, 10.18 versus 8.41 q/ha.

    Ecofriendly integrated pest management in pigeonpea · 2014 · compared with non-IPM

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    One ICM module had significantly greater pigeon pea productivity than the comparison module.

    Effect of integrated crop management practices on root-shoot characteristics, yield and nutrient harvest index of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) under irrigated north Indian Plains · 2001 · compared with ICM

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    The first IPM module yielded 770 kg/ha versus 550 kg/ha for sole pigeonpea.

    Habitat Manipulation: An Important Component of IPM in the Management of Webbing Caterpillar, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in Pigeonpea · 2021 · compared with sole pigeonpea crop

    No difference from an alternative

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Trifluralin with one hand weeding had an edge over pendimethalin with one hand weeding in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.

    Effect of sowing time and weed management on performance of pigeonpea · 2014 · compared with pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha (PE) fb 1 HW at 60 DAS

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
    Weed-free conditions produced maximum growth parameters and yield components.

    EFFECT OF INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF PIGEONPEA (CAJANUS CAJAN (L.) MILLSP.) · 2015

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    In the first year, all herbicide treatments increased pigeonpea yield by more than 22% over the untreated control.

    Integrated weed management using row arrangements and herbicides in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in Australia · 2019 · compared with untreated control

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
    Weed-free treatment maximized pigeonpea seed yield, comparable with the stated hoeing and herbicide treatments.

    Productivity and Weed Control Efficiency of Integrated Weed Management Practices in Pigeonpea+Soybean Intercropping System under Rainfed Condition · 2003 · compared with two hoeings+1 H. W. and pendimethalin at 0.75 and 1.0 kg ha−1both supplemented with one hand weeding

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    All weed control treatments increased pigeonpea yield versus unweeded check.

    Weed Management Studies in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) · 1995 · compared with unweeded check

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Pendimethalin followed by paraquat at eight weeks gave the maximum seed yield increase.

    Increase in growth and yield of pigeonpea with weed management · 2014

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Pendimethalin at 1.0 kg/ha plus one hand weeding at 45 days after sowing gave significantly higher net returns than all other weed management practices.

    Effect of nitrogen levels and weed management practices on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and rice (Oryza sativa) intercropping system under ridge-furrow planting system. · 2009 · compared with all weed management practices

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    Weed-free treatment had maximum pigeonpea yield of 1934 kg/ha.

    Response of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) · 2016 · compared with all other treatments

    No difference from an alternative

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 158 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Fertilizer improved pigeon pea yields by 32–449% compared with unfertilized intercrops.

    Sustainable Intensification with Cereal-Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa · 2019 · compared with unfertilized intercrops

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
    Green manuring in peanut+pigeonpea gave higher pigeonpea grain yield of 1.76 t ha −1.

    Productivity, Nutrient, and Soil Enzymes Influenced with Conservation Agriculture Practices in Peanut · 2018

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    Pigeonpea grain yield was highest at 801 kg ha−1 with half of N from subabul and half of RDF.

    Changes in organic carbon, available N, P and K under integrated use of organic manure, green manure and fertilizer on sustaining productivity of pearl millet-pigeonpea system and fertility of an inceptisol · 2003

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
    FYM plus BI gave higher equivalent system grain productivity in year one.

    Assessment of bio-inoculants-mediated nutrient management in terms of productivity, profitability and nutrient harvest index of pigeon pea–wheat cropping system in India · 2020

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    Improved land, water and nutrient management let the sorghum/pigeonpea intercrop produce higher mean grain yields than the traditional system at ICRISAT.

    Climate change and sustainable rain-fed agriculture: challenges and opportunities. · 2009 · compared with traditional system

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Integrated fertilizer increased plant dry matter, root CEC, root N, grain yield, protein, protein harvest and nutrient uptake.

    Response of Intercropping and Integrated Nutrition on Production Potential and Profitability on Rainfed Pigeonpea · 2012

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Five tonnes FYM per hectare increased component-crop and pigeon pea-equivalent yields.

    Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Pigeon Pea-based Intercropping System and Soil Properties in Mollisols of the Tarai Region · 2012 · compared with no application of FYM

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    The combined fertilizer, vermicompost nitrogen and zinc treatment increased pigeonpea grain yield to 21.05 q/ha.

    Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of rainfed pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and blackgram (Vigna mungo) intercropping system · 2015

    No difference from an alternative

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.