Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of integrated crop management practices on root-shoot characteristics, yield and nutrient harvest index of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) under irrigated north Indian Plains

T. VARATHARAJAN; ANIL K. CHOUDHARY; VIJAY POONIYA; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rainy season of 2017 at experimental farm of ICARIndian Agricul- tural Research Institute, New Delhi under pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp]wheat [Triticum aestivum L.] crop- ping system to assess the effect of different integrated crop management (ICM) modules [04 conventional tillage (CT) based: (ICM ICM ); 04 conservation agriculture (CA) based: (ICM ICM ); 01 organic agriculture based: 1 4 5 8 (ICM )] on root-shoot characteristics, seed yield and nutrient harvest index (NHI) in pigeon pea. The experiment 9 was planned in a randomized block design with 03 replications. The results show that ICM modules (ICM , ICM , 8 6 ICM , and ICM ) supplied with 75% NPK through chemical fertilizers + arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) + NPK- 4 2 biofertilizer (NPK-bf) had an edge over the 100% NPK alone supplied ICM , ICM , ICM , ICM modules with re- 7 5 3 1 spect to root characteristics. However, branches/plant (22.7) and pigeon pea productivity (1.92 t/ha) were signifi- cantly higher under ICM module over ICM . Similarly, the 100% NPK supplied ICM modules had an edge over 7 8 75% NPK + AMF + NPK-bf supplied ICM modules with respect to number of branches/plant and seed yield owing to balanced supply of plant nutrients readily available to crop. The effect of different ICM modules on nutrient har- vest index (NHI) for NPK was found non-significant. In general, the CA based ICM modules showed an edge over CT based ICM modules with respect to root-shoot characteristics, seed yield and NHI. Overall, the CA based mod- ules like ICM and ICM can be recommended to the farmers for enhancing the crop productivity in pigeon pea 7 8 alone or on pigeon peawheat cropping system based in irrigated Indo-Gangetic plains region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% NPK plus AMF and biofertilizer modules improved root characteristics relative to 100% NPK modules.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
75% NPK through chemical fertilizers + arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) + NPK- 4 2 biofertilizer (NPK-bf)e0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e0symbiont
Outcome
root characteristicse0
Direction
had an edgee0
Comparator
100% NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75% NPK through chemical fertilizers + arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) + NPK- 4 2 biofertilizer (NPK-bf) had an edge over the 100% NPK alone supplied ICM , ICM , ICM , ICM modules with re- 7 5 3 1 spect to root characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One ICM module had significantly more branches per plant than the comparison module.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
ICM modulee0
Outcome
branches/plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.7e0
Comparator
ICMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“branches/plant (22.7) and pigeon pea productivity (1.92 t/ha) were signifi- cantly higher under ICM module over ICM .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One ICM module had significantly greater pigeon pea productivity than the comparison module.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
ICM modulee0
Outcome
pigeon pea productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.92 t/hae0
Comparator
ICMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“branches/plant (22.7) and pigeon pea productivity (1.92 t/ha) were signifi- cantly higher under ICM module over ICM .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% NPK modules had more branches per plant and seed yield than the 75% NPK plus AMF and biofertilizer modules.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
100% NPK supplied ICM modulese0
Outcome
number of branches/plant and seed yielde0
Direction
had an edgee0
Comparator
75% NPK + AMF + NPK-bf supplied ICM modulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 100% NPK supplied ICM modules had an edge over 7 8 75% NPK + AMF + NPK-bf supplied ICM modules with respect to number of branches/plant and seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICM modules did not differ significantly in NPK nutrient harvest index.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
different ICM modulese0
Outcome
nutrient har- vest index (NHI) for NPKe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of different ICM modules on nutrient har- vest index (NHI) for NPK was found non-significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation-agriculture ICM modules outperformed conventional-tillage modules for root-shoot characteristics, seed yield and NHI.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
CA based ICM modulese0
Outcome
root-shoot characteristics, seed yield and NHIe0
Direction
showed an edgee0
Comparator
CT based ICM modulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CA based ICM modules showed an edge over CT based ICM modules with respect to root-shoot characteristics, seed yield and NHI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–140 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended CA-based ICM modules for pigeon pea productivity in irrigated Indo-Gangetic plains.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
enhancing the crop productivitye0
Setting
irrigated Indo-Gangetic plains regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CA based mod- ules like ICM and ICM can be recommended to the farmers for enhancing the crop productivity in pigeon pea 7 8 alone or on pigeon peawheat cropping system based in irrigated Indo-Gangetic plains region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1774 · show in text ↑

ipm · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

tillage · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.