Paper · 2015 · Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences(An International Journal)

Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of greengram (Vigna radiata L.) in custard apple-based agri-horti system under rainfed condition

Rana Veer Singh; Sktri Pathi; RP Singh

8
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2010 at Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh) to determine the effect of inorganic fertilizers and organic manure on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by green gram (Vigna radiata L. cv. HUM-12). Integrated application of 50% RDF + 100% poultry manure (T6) recorded significantly higher dry matter (39.11 g plant-1), seed yield(1002 kg ha-1), straw yield(3102 kg ha-1) and nutrient uptake in grain (28.13, 3.72 and 10.06 NPK kg ha-1, respectively) of greengram, consequently resulted maximum gross return (75110 ha-1), net return (59263 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (4.56). Thus, combined application of inorganic fertilizer and organic manure was found to be the best for higher productivity and profitability of greengram cultivation in custard apple-based agri-horti system under rainfed condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 50% RDF plus 100% poultry manure significantly increased greengram dry matter

Material
HUM-12e6
Treatment
50% RDF + 100% poultry manuree0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Value
39.11 g plant-1e0
Setting
Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Integrated application of 50% RDF + 100% poultry manure (T6) recorded significantly higher dry matter (39.11 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–361 · show in text ↑
e6

“Vigna radiata L. cv. HUM-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–239 · show in text ↑
e7

“A field experiment was carried out during kharif season of 2010 at Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 50% RDF plus 100% poultry manure increased greengram seed yield

Material
HUM-12e6
Treatment
50% RDF + 100% poultry manuree0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
highere0
Value
1002 kg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Integrated application of 50% RDF + 100% poultry manure (T6) recorded significantly higher dry matter (39.11 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–361 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed yield(1002 kg ha-1), straw yield(3102 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–414 · show in text ↑
e6

“Vigna radiata L. cv. HUM-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 50% RDF plus 100% poultry manure increased greengram straw yield

Material
HUM-12e6
Treatment
50% RDF + 100% poultry manuree0
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
highere0
Value
3102 kg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Integrated application of 50% RDF + 100% poultry manure (T6) recorded significantly higher dry matter (39.11 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–361 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed yield(1002 kg ha-1), straw yield(3102 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–414 · show in text ↑
e6

“Vigna radiata L. cv. HUM-12”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 50% RDF plus 100% poultry manure increased nutrient uptake in greengram grain

Treatment
50% RDF + 100% poultry manuree0
Outcome
nutrient uptake in graine2
Direction
highere0
Value
28.13, 3.72 and 10.06 NPK kg ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Integrated application of 50% RDF + 100% poultry manure (T6) recorded significantly higher dry matter (39.11 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–361 · show in text ↑
e2

“nutrient uptake in grain (28.13, 3.72 and 10.06 NPK kg ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 50% RDF plus 100% poultry manure gave the maximum gross return from greengram

Treatment
50% RDF + 100% poultry manuree0
Outcome
gross returne3
Direction
maximume3
Value
75110 ha-1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Integrated application of 50% RDF + 100% poultry manure (T6) recorded significantly higher dry matter (39.11 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–361 · show in text ↑
e3

“resulted maximum gross return (75110 ha-1), net return (59263 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (4.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 50% RDF plus 100% poultry manure gave the maximum net return from greengram

Treatment
50% RDF + 100% poultry manuree0
Outcome
net returne3
Direction
maximume3
Value
59263 ha-1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Integrated application of 50% RDF + 100% poultry manure (T6) recorded significantly higher dry matter (39.11 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–361 · show in text ↑
e3

“resulted maximum gross return (75110 ha-1), net return (59263 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (4.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated 50% RDF plus 100% poultry manure gave the maximum benefit: cost ratio in greengram

Treatment
50% RDF + 100% poultry manuree0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe3
Direction
maximume3
Value
4.56e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Integrated application of 50% RDF + 100% poultry manure (T6) recorded significantly higher dry matter (39.11 g plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–361 · show in text ↑
e3

“resulted maximum gross return (75110 ha-1), net return (59263 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (4.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–619 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inorganic fertilizer and organic manure is the best option for higher greengram productivity and profitability

Treatment
combined application of inorganic fertilizer and organic manuree4
Outcome
higher productivity and profitabilitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“combined application of inorganic fertilizer and organic manure was found to be the best for higher productivity and profitability of greengram cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–782 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.