Paper · 2012 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Productivity and Profitability of Maize Based Intercropping Systems

Amit Bhatnagar; Mahendra Singh Pal; Veer Singh

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To find out the most compatible legume intercrop in maize, field experiments were conducted at G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar during 2007 and 2008 with six treatments viz., sole maize, maize + urdbean (2:2), maize + mungbean (2:2), maize + cowpea (2:2), maize + groundnut (2:2) and maize + soybean (2:2) in randomized block design with three replications. Maize was sown in paired row system of 45/90 cm in all the treatments. Two lines of intercrops were sown in inter-space of 90 cm between two pair. Grain yield of maize in sole crop was significantly more than intercropped with urdbean, mungbean and soybean. Though, intercropping of legumes reduced the grain yield of maize, intercropping increased the maize equivalent yield than sole maize. Maize + groundnut system recorded significantly more maize equivalent yield and was economically more viable than other maize based intercropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had significantly greater grain yield than maize intercropped with urdbean.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercropped with urdbeane0
Outcome
Grain yield of maizee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of maize in sole crop was significantly more than intercropped with urdbean, mungbean and soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had significantly greater grain yield than maize intercropped with mungbean.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
mungbeane0
Outcome
Grain yield of maizee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of maize in sole crop was significantly more than intercropped with urdbean, mungbean and soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had significantly greater grain yield than maize intercropped with soybean.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
soybeane0
Outcome
Grain yield of maizee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield of maize in sole crop was significantly more than intercropped with urdbean, mungbean and soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume intercropping reduced maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercropping of legumese0
Outcome
grain yield of maizee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of legumes reduced the grain yield of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume intercropping increased maize equivalent yield over sole maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping increased the maize equivalent yield than sole maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize with groundnut had significantly greater maize equivalent yield than other systems.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Maize + groundnut systeme0
Outcome
maize equivalent yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other maize based intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize + groundnut system recorded significantly more maize equivalent yield and was economically more viable than other maize based intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize with groundnut was more economically viable than other maize intercropping systems.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Maize + groundnut systeme0
Outcome
economically more viablee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other maize based intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize + groundnut system recorded significantly more maize equivalent yield and was economically more viable than other maize based intercropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–935 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Vigna mungo · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 55 positive, 5 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.