Paper · 2020 · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Rotation Benefits From N2-Fixing Grain Legumes to Cereals: From Increases in Seed Yield and Quality to Greater Household Cash-Income by a Following Maize Crop

David M. Lengwati; Cherian Mathews; Felix D. Dakora

19
claims
25
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We investigated Bambara groundnut, groundnut, mung bean, cowpea and black gram for use as biofertilizers in cropping systems. The 15N natural abundance technique was used to measure N2 fixation in this study. The percent N derived from fixation by mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek), Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp.), black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L was 98, 83, 79, 66 and 45% respectively. Nitrogen contribution by these legumes was 83, 67, 39, 36 and 32 kg.ha-1 respectively for Bambara groundnut, groundnut, mung bean, black gram and cowpea. Maize grain yield without N fertilizer was 2449, 2291, 2204, 2046 and 1671 kg.ha-1 respectively for maize following groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, black gram and maize. Grain yield increase of maize after legumes without N fertilizer was 47, 46, 37, 32 and 22% respectively for groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, and black gram. Supplying N0 up to N60 to maize plants increased shoot DM from 3264 to 4279 kg.ha-1, yield grain from 2184 to 3586 kg.ha-1, and whole-plant DM from 5448 to 7865 kg.ha-1, which represented 31, 64 and 44% increase with N fertilizer supply from 0 to 60 kg N ha-1. Symbiotic N benefit of preceding legumes to maize without N fertilizer was 20 to 40 kg N. ha-1 in fertilizer equivalents. The preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca, S, Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize. There was 225, 222, 180, 154 and 108% increase in marginal returns of maize after groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean and black gram respectively without N fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mung bean derived 98% of its N from fixation.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Outcome
percent N derived from fixatione0
Value
98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent N derived from fixation by mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek), Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp.), black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L was 98, 83, 79, 66 and 45% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bambara groundnut derived 83% of its N from fixation.

Taxon
Bambara groundnutVigna subterraneae0
Outcome
percent N derived from fixatione0
Value
83e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna subterranea
Vigna subterranea · TaxonRoger Culos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent N derived from fixation by mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek), Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp.), black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L was 98, 83, 79, 66 and 45% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea derived 79% of its N from fixation.

Outcome
percent N derived from fixatione0
Value
79e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent N derived from fixation by mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek), Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp.), black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L was 98, 83, 79, 66 and 45% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram derived 66% of its N from fixation.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungoe0
Outcome
percent N derived from fixatione0
Value
66e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent N derived from fixation by mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek), Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp.), black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L was 98, 83, 79, 66 and 45% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut derived 45% of its N from fixation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
percent N derived from fixatione0
Value
45%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent N derived from fixation by mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek), Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp.), black gram (Vigna mungo L.) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L was 98, 83, 79, 66 and 45% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut as preceding crop increased maize grain yield without N fertilizer by 47% relative to maize after maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
groundnute0
Outcome
Grain yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
47e0
Qualifier
without N fertilizere0
Comparator
maize after maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increase of maize after legumes without N fertilizer was 47, 46, 37, 32 and 22% respectively for groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, and black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“The preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca, S, Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bambara groundnut as preceding crop increased maize grain yield without N fertilizer by 46% relative to maize after maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Bambara groundnute0
Outcome
Grain yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
46e0
Qualifier
without N fertilizere0
Comparator
maize after maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increase of maize after legumes without N fertilizer was 47, 46, 37, 32 and 22% respectively for groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, and black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“The preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca, S, Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea as preceding crop increased maize grain yield without N fertilizer by 37% relative to maize after maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
cowpeae0
Outcome
Grain yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
37e0
Qualifier
without N fertilizere0
Comparator
maize after maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increase of maize after legumes without N fertilizer was 47, 46, 37, 32 and 22% respectively for groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, and black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“The preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca, S, Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mung bean as preceding crop increased maize grain yield without N fertilizer by 32% relative to maize after maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
mung beane0
Outcome
Grain yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32e0
Qualifier
without N fertilizere0
Comparator
maize after maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increase of maize after legumes without N fertilizer was 47, 46, 37, 32 and 22% respectively for groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, and black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“The preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca, S, Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black gram as preceding crop increased maize grain yield without N fertilizer by 22% relative to maize after maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
black grame0
Outcome
Grain yield increasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
22e0
Qualifier
without N fertilizere0
Comparator
maize after maizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increase of maize after legumes without N fertilizer was 47, 46, 37, 32 and 22% respectively for groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, and black gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“The preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca, S, Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplying N0 to N60 increased maize shoot dry matter from 3264 to 4279 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N fertilizer supply from 0 to 60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
shoot DMe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3264 to 4279 kg.ha-1e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplying N0 up to N60 to maize plants increased shoot DM from 3264 to 4279 kg.ha-1, yield grain from 2184 to 3586 kg.ha-1, and whole-plant DM from 5448 to 7865 kg.ha-1, which represented 31, 64 and 44% increase with N fertilizer supply from 0 to 60 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplying N0 to N60 increased maize grain yield from 2184 to 3586 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N fertilizer supply from 0 to 60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
yield graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2184 to 3586 kg.ha-1e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplying N0 up to N60 to maize plants increased shoot DM from 3264 to 4279 kg.ha-1, yield grain from 2184 to 3586 kg.ha-1, and whole-plant DM from 5448 to 7865 kg.ha-1, which represented 31, 64 and 44% increase with N fertilizer supply from 0 to 60 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplying N0 to N60 increased maize whole-plant dry matter from 5448 to 7865 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N fertilizer supply from 0 to 60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
whole-plant DMe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5448 to 7865 kg.ha-1e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplying N0 up to N60 to maize plants increased shoot DM from 3264 to 4279 kg.ha-1, yield grain from 2184 to 3586 kg.ha-1, and whole-plant DM from 5448 to 7865 kg.ha-1, which represented 31, 64 and 44% increase with N fertilizer supply from 0 to 60 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1248 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preceding legumes gave maize a symbiotic N benefit of 20 to 40 kg N/ha in fertilizer equivalents without N fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
preceding legumese0
Outcome
Symbiotic N benefite0
Value
20 to 40 kg N. ha-1e0
Qualifier
in fertilizer equivalentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symbiotic N benefit of preceding legumes to maize without N fertilizer was 20 to 40 kg N. ha-1 in fertilizer equivalents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca and S in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
preceding legumese0
Outcome
grain concentrations of P, Ca, Se0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in zero-N plotse0
Comparator
maize after maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca, S, Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
preceding legumese0
Outcome
Fe, Mn and Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in zero-N plotse0
Comparator
maize after maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preceding legumes increased maize grain concentrations of P, Ca, S, Fe, Mn and Zn in zero-N plots relative to maize after maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marginal returns of maize after groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean and black gram rose by 225%, 222%, 180%, 154% and 108% respectively without N fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
marginal returnse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
225, 222, 180, 154 and 108%e0
Qualifier
without N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was 225, 222, 180, 154 and 108% increase in marginal returns of maize after groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean and black gram respectively without N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1683 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legumes grown before maize contributed 83, 67, 39, 36 and 32 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Grain Legumest0
Outcome
Nitrogen contributione0
Value
83, 67, 39, 36 and 32 kg.ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen contribution by these legumes was 83, 67, 39, 36 and 32 kg.ha-1 respectively for Bambara groundnut, groundnut, mung bean, black gram and cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“N2-Fixing Grain Legumes to Cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield without N fertilizer was 2449, 2291, 2204, 2046 and 1671 kg/ha after the five preceding crops and after maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Maize grain yield without N fertilizere0
Value
2449, 2291, 2204, 2046 and 1671 kg.ha-1e0
Qualifier
following groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, black gram and maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize grain yield without N fertilizer was 2449, 2291, 2204, 2046 and 1671 kg.ha-1 respectively for maize following groundnut, Bambara groundnut, cowpea, mung bean, black gram and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–813 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Vigna mungo · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 55 positive, 5 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Vigna subterranea · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.