Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Black Gram Intercropping and Weed Control Measures on Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Ishaq Rahimi; T. Ananthi; M. Mohamed Amanullah

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during kharif 2013 to investigate the influence of intercropping systems and weed management practices on the growth and yield of maize under irrigated condition. The experiment was laid out in split plot design and replicated thrice. The popular maize hybrid CO6 was used as test variety. Three intercropping systems and four weed management practices were accommodated under main plot and subplots, respectively. The sole crop of maize recorded improved growth parameters, yield attributes and yield than maize under intercropping systems. The reduction in yield under maize + blackgram intercropping at 1:1 ratio was negligible (3.52 %), whereas there was a significant reduction in the grain yield of maize (7.57 %) under maize + blackgram intercropping at 2:2 ratio. The yield attributes viz., cob length, cob girth, number of grain rows cob-1, number of grains row-1, cob weight and test weight were higher under sole maize among intercropping systems and pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE 3 DAS + one HW 25 DAS among weed management practices. The treatment combination of sole maize with pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE + one HW 25 DAS (I1W2) recorded higher grain yield (5755 kg ha-1) followed by maize + blackgram intercropping at 1:1 ratio with pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE + one HW 25 DAS (I2 W2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had improved growth, yield attributes and yield relative to intercropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sole crop of maizee0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
maize under intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sole crop of maize recorded improved growth parameters, yield attributes and yield than maize under intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plus blackgram at 1:1 reduced maize yield by 3.52%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize + blackgram intercropping at 1:1 ratioe0
Interactor
blackgramVigna mungoe0other
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
3.52 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · InteractorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in yield under maize + blackgram intercropping at 1:1 ratio was negligible (3.52 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize plus blackgram at 2:2 significantly reduced maize grain yield by 7.57%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize + blackgram intercropping at 2:2 ratioe0
Interactor
blackgramVigna mungoe0other
Outcome
grain yield of maizee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
7.57 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · InteractorSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a significant reduction in the grain yield of maize (7.57 %) under maize + blackgram intercropping at 2:2 ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had higher cob length, cob girth and grain rows per cob.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sole maizee0
Outcome
cob length, cob girth, number of grain rows cob-1e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes viz., cob length, cob girth, number of grain rows cob-1, number of grains row-1, cob weight and test weight were higher under sole maize among intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had higher grains per row, cob weight and test weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sole maizee0
Outcome
number of grains row-1, cob weight and test weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes viz., cob length, cob girth, number of grain rows cob-1, number of grains row-1, cob weight and test weight were higher under sole maize among intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus hand weeding gave higher yield attributes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE 3 DAS + one HW 25 DASe0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield attributes viz., cob length, cob girth, number of grain rows cob-1, number of grains row-1, cob weight and test weight were higher under sole maize among intercropping systems and pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE 3 DAS + one HW 25 DAS among weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize with pendimethalin and hand weeding had the higher grain yield of 5755 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sole maize with pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE + one HW 25 DASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5755 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
maize + blackgram intercropping at 1:1 ratio with pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE + one HW 25 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment combination of sole maize with pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE + one HW 25 DAS (I1W2) recorded higher grain yield (5755 kg ha-1) followed by maize + blackgram intercropping at 1:1 ratio with pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as PE + one HW 25 DAS (I2 W2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1395 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Vigna mungo · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.