Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research

Influence of drip fertigation on resultant seed quality in main and ratoon crops of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) cv. VBN 3.

S Manikandan; K. Sivasubramaniam; R. Geetha

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A laboratory experiment was conducted at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, during two seasons to study the effect of drip fertigation on resultant seed quality in main and ratoon crops of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) cv. VBN 3. The treatments consisted of four fertigation levels viz., F1: 50%, F2: 75%, F3: 100% and F4: 100% of seed recommended dose of fertilizers through drip combined with three foliar spray of FS1: 0.5% ZnSO4, FS2: 100 ppm succinic acid and FS3: 100 ppm humic acid and control having surface irrigation and soil application of fertilizers. The results revealed that fertigation and foliar spray treatments exhibited significant effect on seed quality parameters. Among the treatments, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12 resultant seed quality were recorded higher 100 seed weight, germination, seedling length, dry matter production and vigour index as compared to T1, T2, T3 and control in both season. Between the crops, main crop resultant seed quality was better over ratoon crop of pigeonpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation and foliar spray treatments significantly affected seed quality.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
fertigation and foliar spray treatmentse0
Outcome
seed quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertigation and foliar spray treatments exhibited significant effect on seed quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 through T12 gave higher 100 seed weight than T1 through T3 and control in both seasons.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12e0
Outcome
100 seed weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in both seasone0
Comparator
T1, T2, T3 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12 resultant seed quality were recorded higher 100 seed weight, germination, seedling length, dry matter production and vigour index as compared to T1, T2, T3 and control in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 through T12 gave higher germination than T1 through T3 and control in both seasons.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T1, T2, T3 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12 resultant seed quality were recorded higher 100 seed weight, germination, seedling length, dry matter production and vigour index as compared to T1, T2, T3 and control in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 through T12 gave higher seedling length than T1 through T3 and control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12e0
Outcome
seedling lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T1, T2, T3 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12 resultant seed quality were recorded higher 100 seed weight, germination, seedling length, dry matter production and vigour index as compared to T1, T2, T3 and control in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 through T12 gave higher dry matter production than T1 through T3 and control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12e0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T1, T2, T3 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12 resultant seed quality were recorded higher 100 seed weight, germination, seedling length, dry matter production and vigour index as compared to T1, T2, T3 and control in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 through T12 gave higher vigour index than T1 through T3 and control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12e0
Outcome
vigour indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T1, T2, T3 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11 and T12 resultant seed quality were recorded higher 100 seed weight, germination, seedling length, dry matter production and vigour index as compared to T1, T2, T3 and control in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main crop pigeonpea seed quality exceeded ratoon crop seed quality.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
main crope0
Outcome
resultant seed qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
ratoon crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“main crop resultant seed quality was better over ratoon crop of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1044 · show in text ↑