Paper · 2003 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of Weed Management Practices on Weeds, Soil Micro Flora and Yield of Sugarcane Ratoon

Brajesh Singh; N. S. Rana

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed management practices on weeds, soil micro flora and yield of sugarcane ratoon during 1999–2000 and 2000–01. Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon and Sorghum halepense dominated the field. Better weed control efficiency was recorded with trash burning+interculture+atrazine 2 kg ha−1. Highest mean population of bacteria (207 x 103 cfu g−1), fungi (39.4 x 102 cfu g−1), actinomycetes (16.25 x 103 cfu g−1) and microbial biomass carbon (317 μg g−1) was recorded under trash mulching+interculture as against 2.01 x 107 cfu g−1, 33.9 x 102 cfu g−1, 12.0 x 103 and 266.5 μg g−1, respectively under weedy conditions. Trash burning+interculture+preemergence application of atrazine at 2.0 kg ha−1 gave 48.9% higher cane yield than weedy condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash burning with interculture and atrazine 2 kg ha−1 gave better weed control efficiency.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
trash burning+interculture+atrazine 2 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
Bettere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed management practices on weeds, soil micro flora and yield of sugarcane ratoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e1

“Better weed control efficiency was recorded with trash burning+interculture+atrazine 2 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash mulching with interculture gave the highest mean population of bacteria in sugarcane soil, 207 x 103 cfu g−1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
trash mulching+interculturee2
Outcome
mean population of bacteriae2
Direction
Higheste2
Value
207 x 103 cfu g−1e2
Qualifier
2.01 x 107 cfu g−1e2
Comparator
weedy conditionse2

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed management practices on weeds, soil micro flora and yield of sugarcane ratoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest mean population of bacteria (207 x 103 cfu g−1), fungi (39.4 x 102 cfu g−1), actinomycetes (16.25 x 103 cfu g−1) and microbial biomass carbon (317 μg g−1) was recorded under trash mulching+interculture as against 2.01 x 107 cfu g−1, 33.9 x 102 cfu g−1, 12.0 x 103 and 266.5 μg g−1, respectively under weedy conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash mulching with interculture gave the highest fungal population, 39.4 x 102 cfu g−1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
trash mulching+interculturee2
Outcome
fungie2
Direction
Higheste2
Value
39.4 x 102 cfu g−1e2
Qualifier
33.9 x 102 cfu g−1e2
Comparator
weedy conditionse2

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed management practices on weeds, soil micro flora and yield of sugarcane ratoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest mean population of bacteria (207 x 103 cfu g−1), fungi (39.4 x 102 cfu g−1), actinomycetes (16.25 x 103 cfu g−1) and microbial biomass carbon (317 μg g−1) was recorded under trash mulching+interculture as against 2.01 x 107 cfu g−1, 33.9 x 102 cfu g−1, 12.0 x 103 and 266.5 μg g−1, respectively under weedy conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash mulching with interculture gave the highest actinomycetes population, 16.25 x 103 cfu g−1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
trash mulching+interculturee2
Outcome
actinomycetese2
Direction
Higheste2
Value
16.25 x 103 cfu g−1e2
Qualifier
12.0 x 103e2
Comparator
weedy conditionse2

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed management practices on weeds, soil micro flora and yield of sugarcane ratoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest mean population of bacteria (207 x 103 cfu g−1), fungi (39.4 x 102 cfu g−1), actinomycetes (16.25 x 103 cfu g−1) and microbial biomass carbon (317 μg g−1) was recorded under trash mulching+interculture as against 2.01 x 107 cfu g−1, 33.9 x 102 cfu g−1, 12.0 x 103 and 266.5 μg g−1, respectively under weedy conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash mulching with interculture gave the highest microbial biomass carbon, 317 μg g−1.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
trash mulching+interculturee2
Outcome
microbial biomass carbone2
Direction
Higheste2
Value
317 μg g−1e2
Qualifier
266.5 μg g−1e2
Comparator
weedy conditionse2

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed management practices on weeds, soil micro flora and yield of sugarcane ratoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest mean population of bacteria (207 x 103 cfu g−1), fungi (39.4 x 102 cfu g−1), actinomycetes (16.25 x 103 cfu g−1) and microbial biomass carbon (317 μg g−1) was recorded under trash mulching+interculture as against 2.01 x 107 cfu g−1, 33.9 x 102 cfu g−1, 12.0 x 103 and 266.5 μg g−1, respectively under weedy conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash burning with interculture and preemergence atrazine at 2.0 kg ha−1 gave 48.9% higher cane yield than weedy condition.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Trash burning+interculture+preemergence application of atrazine at 2.0 kg ha−1e3
Outcome
cane yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
48.9%e3
Comparator
weedy conditione3

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of weed management practices on weeds, soil micro flora and yield of sugarcane ratoon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
e3

“Trash burning+interculture+preemergence application of atrazine at 2.0 kg ha−1 gave 48.9% higher cane yield than weedy condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–796 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Atrazine followed by trash mulching raised cane yield versus the other herbicide applications.

    Herbicidal-cum-Integrated Approach of Weed Management in Spring Planted Sugarcane · 2001 · compared with pre- and post-emergence application of 2,4-D, diuron, pendimethalene each at 1.0 kg ha−1 and oxyfluorfen 0.3 kg ha−1

    Same direction

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fire · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

herbicide · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

51 papers: 37 positive, 14 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fire · weed · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.