Paper · 2006 · Agronomy Research

Effects of biopesticide Neem EC on the Large White Butterfly, Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).

M. Grišakova; L. Metspalu; Katrin Jõgar; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The effects of Neem EC (M/S RYM Exports - The Indian Neem Tree Company, 1% azadirachtin) were assessed on the Large White Butterfly, Pieris brassicae - a major pest of cruciferous plants. Duration of the larval stage, mortality of larvae and prepupae, and weight of pupae were studied. The time needed for completion of the larval stages by individuals fed on treated cabbage increased significantly, compared with the control: 16-37 days in the test variant, versus 11-18 days in the control. Neem EC also induced high mortality, caused by lethal failures of larval-larval and larval-pupal ecdysis, which were typical for insecticides possessing morphogenetic activity commonly referred to as IGR-activity. The mortality of larvae and prepupae in the test variant was significantly higher than in the control. Considerably fewer pupae were gained in the test variant than in the control variant. The pupae of larvae that had been feeding on the control were significantly heavier than those of the larvae feeding on the treated plants. The experiment revealed that Neem EC had both toxic and antifeedant/deterrent effects but also acted as a growth regulator for P. brassicae larvae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval development lasted longer on treated cabbage than control cabbage.

Treatment
treated cabbagee0
Interactor
Pieris brassicaePieris brassicaet0pest
Outcome
time needed for completion of the larval stagese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16-37 dayse0
Qualifier
11-18 dayse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time needed for completion of the larval stages by individuals fed on treated cabbage increased significantly, compared with the control: 16-37 days in the test variant, versus 11-18 days in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pieris brassicae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem EC caused high mortality in the butterfly through lethal ecdysis failures.

Taxon
cruciferous plantse1
Treatment
Neem ECe0
Interactor
Pieris brassicaePieris brassicaet0pest
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem EC also induced high mortality, caused by lethal failures of larval-larval and larval-pupal ecdysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“cruciferous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval and prepupal mortality was significantly higher in the test variant.

Taxon
cruciferous plantse1
Treatment
test variante0
Interactor
Pieris brassicaePieris brassicaet0pest
Outcome
mortality of larvae and prepupaee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mortality of larvae and prepupae in the test variant was significantly higher than in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“cruciferous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treated variant yielded fewer pupae than the control.

Taxon
cruciferous plantse1
Treatment
test variante0
Interactor
Pieris brassicaePieris brassicaet0pest
Outcome
pupaee0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
the control variante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerably fewer pupae were gained in the test variant than in the control variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“cruciferous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pupae from larvae on control plants were heavier than pupae from treated plants.

Taxon
cruciferous plantse1
Treatment
treated plantse0
Interactor
Pieris brassicaePieris brassicaet0pest
Outcome
pupae of larvaee0
Direction
heaviere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pupae of larvae that had been feeding on the control were significantly heavier than those of the larvae feeding on the treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“cruciferous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem EC showed toxic, antifeedant and growth regulatory effects on larvae.

Taxon
cruciferous plantse1
Treatment
Neem ECe0
Interactor
P. brassicaePieris brassicaee0pest
Outcome
toxic and antifeedant/deterrent effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pieris brassicae
Pieris brassicae · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem EC had both toxic and antifeedant/deterrent effects but also acted as a growth regulator for P. brassicae larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“cruciferous plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–186 · show in text ↑

Brassica oleracea var. capitata · Pieris brassicae · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.