Paper · 2015 · Journal of Crop production and processing

Evaluating Fruit Quantity and Quality of Grafted and Non-grafted two Local Muskmelon

R. Javanpoor; R. Saleh; M. Nejadsahebi; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The present experiment was carried out to evaluate fruit qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two local muskmelons (Cucumis melo Gr. Cantalupensis) “Samsoori” and “Saveh”. A completely randomized block design (RCBD) with 10 treatments and three replications was used for this purpose at research field of Jahad-e-Daneshgahi, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj in 2009. Five commercial cucurbit rootstocks (Ace, Shintozwa, ShintoHongto, Zuktozwa and Ferro) were used as rootstocks. Ace, Shintozwa and ShintoHongto were used as rootstocks for Saveh and Samsori, and Zuktozwa and Ferro were applied as rootstocks just for Samsori. Non-grafted plants were used as control. The results showed that the rootstock had a significant effect on total fruit and marketable fruit number, marketable fruit yield and total soluble solids of Samsori accession. In Saveh accession, the rootstock had a significant effect on mean and marketable fruit weight and fruit thickness. According to mean results, the maximum marketable fruit number (5.68) belonged to Samsori grafted onto Shintozwa rootstock. Samsori grafted on Shintozwa rootstock had a high marketable yield of 10.85 kg. Samsori grafted on different rootstocks had the highest TSS in comparison with non-grafted Samsori and produced sweetest fruits with high brix. The heaviest marketable fruit (3.23 Kg) belonged to Saveh grafted onto Ace rootstock. Saveh accession grafted on Ace rootstock along with non-grafted Saveh had the highest fruit thickness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock had a significant effect on total and marketable fruit number and marketable fruit yield of Samsori.

Taxon
Cucumis melo Gr. CantalupensisCucumis meloe0
Material
Samsorie2
Treatment
rootstocke2
Outcome
total fruit and marketable fruit number, marketable fruit yielde2
Comparator
Non-grafted plantse3
Setting
research field of Jahad-e-Daneshgahi, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaje1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two local muskmelons (Cucumis melo Gr. Cantalupensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“at research field of Jahad-e-Daneshgahi, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj in 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–416 · show in text ↑
e2

“the rootstock had a significant effect on total fruit and marketable fruit number, marketable fruit yield and total soluble solids of Samsori accession”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–893 · show in text ↑
e3

“Non-grafted plants were used as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samsori grafted on different rootstocks had the highest total soluble solids compared with non-grafted Samsori.

Taxon
Cucumis melo Gr. CantalupensisCucumis meloe0
Material
Samsorie4
Treatment
grafted on different rootstockse4
Outcome
TSSe4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
non-grafted Samsorie4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two local muskmelons (Cucumis melo Gr. Cantalupensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–158 · show in text ↑
e4

“Samsori grafted on different rootstocks had the highest TSS in comparison with non-grafted Samsori”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock had a significant effect on mean and marketable fruit weight and fruit thickness of Saveh.

Taxon
Cucumis melo Gr. CantalupensisCucumis meloe0
Material
Savehe5
Treatment
rootstocke5
Outcome
mean and marketable fruit weight and fruit thicknesse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two local muskmelons (Cucumis melo Gr. Cantalupensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–158 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Saveh accession, the rootstock had a significant effect on mean and marketable fruit weight and fruit thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samsori grafted onto Shintozwa rootstock had the maximum marketable fruit number (5.68).

Taxon
Cucumis melo Gr. CantalupensisCucumis meloe0
Material
Samsorie6
Treatment
Shintozwa rootstocke6
Outcome
marketable fruit numbere6
Direction
maximume6
Value
5.68e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two local muskmelons (Cucumis melo Gr. Cantalupensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–158 · show in text ↑
e6

“the maximum marketable fruit number (5.68) belonged to Samsori grafted onto Shintozwa rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samsori grafted on Shintozwa rootstock had a high marketable yield of 10.85 kg.

Taxon
Cucumis melo Gr. CantalupensisCucumis meloe0
Material
Samsorie7
Treatment
Shintozwa rootstocke7
Outcome
marketable yielde7
Direction
highe7
Value
10.85 kge7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two local muskmelons (Cucumis melo Gr. Cantalupensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–158 · show in text ↑
e7

“Samsori grafted on Shintozwa rootstock had a high marketable yield of 10.85 kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saveh grafted onto Ace rootstock had the heaviest marketable fruit (3.23 kg).

Taxon
Cucumis melo Gr. CantalupensisCucumis meloe0
Material
Savehe1
Treatment
Ace rootstocke1
Outcome
marketable fruite1
Direction
heavieste1
Value
3.23 Kge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two local muskmelons (Cucumis melo Gr. Cantalupensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“The heaviest marketable fruit (3.23 Kg) belonged to Saveh grafted onto Ace rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saveh grafted on Ace rootstock had the highest fruit thickness, as did non-grafted Saveh.

Taxon
Cucumis melo Gr. CantalupensisCucumis meloe0
Material
Savehe2
Treatment
Ace rootstocke2
Outcome
fruit thicknesse2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
non-grafted Savehe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit qualitative and quantitative characteristics of two local muskmelons (Cucumis melo Gr. Cantalupensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–158 · show in text ↑
e2

“Saveh accession grafted on Ace rootstock along with non-grafted Saveh had the highest fruit thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1546 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.