Paper · 2006 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Yield, fruit quality and mineral composition of grafted melon plants grown under saline conditions

G. Colla; Y. Rouphael; M. Cardarelli; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
135
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryIn many irrigated areas of the Mediterranean region, farmers are forced to use saline water to irrigate their crops due to an inadequate supply of fresh water. Grafting may represent an effective tool to improve crop tolerance to salinity. Two greenhouse experiments were carried out to determine yield, fruit quality and mineral composition of melon plants (Cucumis melo L. cv. 'Cyrano'), either ungrafted or grafted onto the commercial rootstock 'P360' (Cucurbita maxima C. moschata) and cultured in pumice. Plants were supplied with nutrient solutions having electrical conductivities (EC) of 2.0, 4.0, 5.9, 7.8 or 9.7 dS m–1. The saline nutrient solutions (those > 2.0 dS m–1) had the same basic composition, plus an additional 20, 40, 60 or 80 mM NaCl, respectively. In both years (2003 and 2004), increased salinity in the nutrient solution resulted in a linear decrease in marketable yield compared to controls that was due to reductions in the size and number of marketable fruits. Averaged across years and nutrient solution concentrations, marketable fruit yield was 44% higher in grafted than in ungrafted plants. The lowest marketable yield recorded in ungrafted plants was associated with a reduction in both mean fruit weight and in the number of fruits per plant compared to grafted plants. Salinity improved fruit quality in both grafting combinations by increasing firmness, dry matter (DM), acidity and total soluble solids (TSS) contents. The nutritional qualities of grafted melons such as fruit DM, titratable acidity and TSS content were slightly inferior compared to those of ungrafted plants, whereas physical qualities such as fruit firmness and Hunter colour values (L* and a*/b*) were superior compared to those of plants grown with their own roots. Grafted plants could reduce leaf Na+ ion, but not Cl– ion, concentrations. However, the sensitivity to salinity was similar between grafted and ungrafted plants, and the higher marketable yield from grafted plants was mainly due to grafting per se.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity linearly decreased marketable yield relative to controls.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
increased salinity in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased salinity in the nutrient solution resulted in a linear decrease in marketable yield compared to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced the size and number of marketable fruits.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
increased salinity in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
size and number of marketable fruitse0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased salinity in the nutrient solution resulted in a linear decrease in marketable yield compared to controls that was due to reductions in the size and number of marketable fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted melon plants had 44% higher marketable fruit yield than ungrafted plants.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
graftede0
Outcome
marketable fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marketable fruit yield was 44% higher in grafted than in ungrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the lowest yield, ungrafted plants had lower mean fruit weight and fruits per plant than grafted plants.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
ungrafted plantse0
Outcome
mean fruit weight and in the number of fruits per plante0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
grafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest marketable yield recorded in ungrafted plants was associated with a reduction in both mean fruit weight and in the number of fruits per plant compared to grafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased fruit firmness, dry matter, acidity and soluble solids in both grafting combinations.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
Salinitye0
Outcome
firmness, dry matter (DM), acidity and total soluble solids (TSS) contentse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity improved fruit quality in both grafting combinations by increasing firmness, dry matter (DM), acidity and total soluble solids (TSS) contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted fruit had slightly inferior dry matter, titratable acidity and soluble solids relative to ungrafted fruit.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted melonse0
Outcome
fruit DM, titratable acidity and TSS contente0
Direction
slightly inferiore0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutritional qualities of grafted melons such as fruit DM, titratable acidity and TSS content were slightly inferior compared to those of ungrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted fruit had superior firmness and Hunter colour values relative to fruit grown on its own roots.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafted melonse1
Outcome
fruit firmness and Hunter colour values (L* and a*/b*)e0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
plants grown with their own rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“physical qualities such as fruit firmness and Hunter colour values (L* and a*/b*) were superior compared to those of plants grown with their own roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1783 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nutritional qualities of grafted melons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting reduced leaf Na+ concentration.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
Grafted plantse0
Outcome
leaf Na+ ione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafted plants could reduce leaf Na+ ion, but not Cl– ion, concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting did not reduce leaf Cl– concentration.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
Grafted plantse0
Outcome
Cl– ion, concentrationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafted plants could reduce leaf Na+ ion, but not Cl– ion, concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted and ungrafted plants had similar sensitivity to salinity.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Outcome
sensitivity to salinitye0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
grafted and ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sensitivity to salinity was similar between grafted and ungrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1868–1944 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed higher marketable yield of grafted plants chiefly to grafting itself.

Taxon
melon plantsCucumis melot0
Treatment
grafting per see0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher marketable yield from grafted plants was mainly due to grafting per se.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1950–2032 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–68 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

37 papers: 8 positive, 29 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

salinity · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

grafting · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

grafting · physiology: ion balance · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.